Suppr超能文献

对描述有性伴侣的男性和女性性反应模型的认可:一项针对20 - 65岁丹麦成年人群体样本的在线调查。

Endorsement of models describing sexual response of men and women with a sexual partner: an online survey in a population sample of Danish adults ages 20-65 years.

作者信息

Giraldi Annamaria, Kristensen Ellids, Sand Michael

机构信息

Psychiatric Center Copenhagen, Sexological Clinic, Copenhagen, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.

出版信息

J Sex Med. 2015 Jan;12(1):116-28. doi: 10.1111/jsm.12720. Epub 2014 Nov 3.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Several models have been used to describe men's and women's sexual responses. These models have been conceptualized as linear or circular models. The circular models were proposed to describe women's sexual function best.

AIM

This study aims to determine whether men and women thought that current theoretical models of sexual responses accurately reflected their own sexual experience and to what extent this was influenced by sexual dysfunction.

METHODS

A cross-sectional study of a large, broadly sampled, nonclinical population, cohort of Danish men and women. The Female Sexual Function Index, Female Sexual Distress Scale, and the International Index of Erectile Function were used to describe sexual function. Also, participants completed questionnaires with written descriptions of different sexual responses to describe their most experienced sexual response.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

For women, we measured desire, arousal, lubrication, orgasm, sexual satisfaction, pain during sexual activity, sexual distress, and satisfaction with sexual life. For men, we measured erectile function, orgasm, desire, intercourse satisfaction, overall satisfaction, and satisfaction with sexual life.

RESULTS

A total of 499 men and 573 women participated. We only analyzed responses from sexually active participants with a partner (401 men and 429 women). The majority of men endorsed the Masters & Johnson model (48.5%) or the Kaplan model (38.3%); only 5.4% endorsed the Basson model, and 7.3% endorsed none of the models. Among women, 34% endorsed the Kaplan model, 28% the Masters & Johnson model, 25.6% the Basson model, and 12.5% none of the models. Among women, sexual dysfunction and distress were significantly (P = 0.01) related to endorsement of the Basson model or none of the models. Among men, erectile dysfunction and dissatisfaction with sexual life were significantly related to endorsement of the Basson model or none of the models (P = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

No single model of sexual response could describe men's and women's sexual responses. The majority of men and women with no sexual dysfunction that were satisfied with their sexual life endorsed the linear models.

摘要

引言

已有多种模型用于描述男性和女性的性反应。这些模型被概念化为线性模型或循环模型。循环模型被认为最能描述女性的性功能。

目的

本研究旨在确定男性和女性是否认为当前的性反应理论模型准确反映了他们自己的性经历,以及性功能障碍对此的影响程度。

方法

对丹麦男性和女性的一个大型、广泛抽样的非临床人群队列进行横断面研究。使用女性性功能指数、女性性困扰量表和国际勃起功能指数来描述性功能。此外,参与者完成了关于不同性反应书面描述的问卷,以描述他们最常经历的性反应。

主要观察指标

对于女性,我们测量了性欲、性唤起、润滑、性高潮、性满意度、性交疼痛、性困扰以及对性生活的满意度。对于男性,我们测量了勃起功能、性高潮、性欲、性交满意度、总体满意度以及对性生活的满意度。

结果

共有499名男性和573名女性参与。我们仅分析了有性伴侣的性活跃参与者的回答(401名男性和429名女性)。大多数男性认可马斯特斯和约翰逊模型(48.5%)或卡普兰模型(38.3%);只有5.4%认可巴森模型,7.3%不认可任何模型。在女性中,34%认可卡普兰模型,28%认可马斯特斯和约翰逊模型,25.6%认可巴森模型,12.5%不认可任何模型。在女性中,性功能障碍和性困扰与认可巴森模型或不认可任何模型显著相关(P = 0.01)。在男性中,勃起功能障碍和对性生活的不满与认可巴森模型或不认可任何模型显著相关(P = 0.01)。

结论

没有单一的性反应模型能够描述男性和女性的性反应。大多数没有性功能障碍且对性生活满意的男性和女性认可线性模型。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验