Suppr超能文献

多学科应急培训知识测试的开发:一项综述及一个实例

Development of knowledge tests for multi-disciplinary emergency training: a review and an example.

作者信息

Sørensen J L, Thellesen L, Strandbygaard J, Svendsen K D, Christensen K B, Johansen M, Langhoff-Roos P, Ekelund K, Ottesen B, Van Der Vleuten C

机构信息

Juliane Marie Centre for Children, Women and Reproduction, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.

出版信息

Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2015 Jan;59(1):123-33. doi: 10.1111/aas.12428. Epub 2014 Nov 2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The literature is sparse on written test development in a post-graduate multi-disciplinary setting. Developing and evaluating knowledge tests for use in multi-disciplinary post-graduate training is challenging. The objective of this study was to describe the process of developing and evaluating a multiple-choice question (MCQ) test for use in a multi-disciplinary training program in obstetric-anesthesia emergencies.

METHODS

A multi-disciplinary working committee with 12 members representing six professional healthcare groups and another 28 participants were involved. Recurrent revisions of the MCQ items were undertaken followed by a statistical analysis. The MCQ items were developed stepwise, including decisions on aims and content, followed by testing for face and content validity, construct validity, item-total correlation, and reliability.

RESULTS

To obtain acceptable content validity, 40 out of originally 50 items were included in the final MCQ test. The MCQ test was able to distinguish between levels of competence, and good construct validity was indicated by a significant difference in the mean score between consultants and first-year trainees, as well as between first-year trainees and medical and midwifery students. Evaluation of the item-total correlation analysis in the 40 items set revealed that 11 items needed re-evaluation, four of which addressed content issues in local clinical guidelines. A Cronbach's alpha of 0.83 for reliability was found, which is acceptable.

CONCLUSION

Content and construct validity and reliability were acceptable. The presented template for the development of this MCQ test could be useful to others when developing knowledge tests and may enhance the overall quality of test development.

摘要

背景

关于研究生多学科环境下书面测试开发的文献较少。开发和评估用于多学科研究生培训的知识测试具有挑战性。本研究的目的是描述开发和评估用于产科麻醉紧急情况多学科培训项目的多项选择题(MCQ)测试的过程。

方法

一个由代表六个专业医疗保健组的12名成员组成的多学科工作委员会以及另外28名参与者参与其中。对MCQ项目进行反复修订,随后进行统计分析。MCQ项目逐步开发,包括确定目标和内容,随后测试表面效度和内容效度、结构效度、项目总分相关性和信度。

结果

为了获得可接受的内容效度,最终的MCQ测试纳入了最初50个项目中的40个。MCQ测试能够区分能力水平,顾问与一年级实习生之间以及一年级实习生与医学和助产专业学生之间的平均分数存在显著差异,表明具有良好的结构效度。对40个项目集的项目总分相关性分析评估显示,有11个项目需要重新评估,其中4个涉及当地临床指南中的内容问题。发现信度的Cronbach's alpha为0.83,这是可以接受的。

结论

内容效度、结构效度和信度是可接受的。本MCQ测试开发所呈现的模板在开发知识测试时可能对其他人有用,并可能提高测试开发的整体质量。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验