Hiday V A, Scheid-Cook T L
North Carolina State University, Raleigh 27695.
Hosp Community Psychiatry. 1989 Jan;40(1):52-9. doi: 10.1176/ps.40.1.52.
Data collected in a statewide study of psychiatric patients involved in civil commitment hearings in North Carolina were used to evaluate the effectiveness of outpatient commitment as a less restrictive alternative to involuntary hospitalization. Six months after the commitment hearings, outcome data for patients who were committed to outpatient treatment were compared with outcome data for patients who were released and patients who were involuntarily hospitalized. All three groups comprised patients who were chronically mentally ill, had previously been hospitalized, and had histories of medication refusal and dangerousness. Patients who were committed to outpatient treatment were significantly more likely than patients with the other two dispositions to utilize aftercare services and to continue in treatment.
在北卡罗来纳州一项针对参与民事强制治疗听证会的精神病患者的全州性研究中收集的数据,被用于评估门诊强制治疗作为非自愿住院的一种限制较小的替代方案的有效性。在强制治疗听证会六个月后,将被强制接受门诊治疗的患者的结果数据与被释放患者和非自愿住院患者的结果数据进行了比较。所有三组患者均为慢性精神病患者,此前均已住院,且有拒绝服药和危险性的病史。与其他两种处置方式的患者相比,被强制接受门诊治疗的患者明显更有可能利用后续护理服务并继续接受治疗。