Meyer Carly, Hickson Louise, Khan Asad, Walker David
School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
J Am Acad Audiol. 2014 Jul-Aug;25(7):644-55. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.25.7.3.
Between 68.1-89.5% of clients report that they are satisfied with their hearing aids. Two variables that are thought to contribute to dissatisfaction with hearing aids are product performance, and a mismatch between performance and client prefitting expectations about hearing-aid performance (i.e., disconfirmation). A focus on variables related to satisfaction is relevant to improving hearing rehabilitation services.
The aim of this study was to determine if measures of hearing-aid performance and disconfirmation, specifically related to hearing ability and hearing-aid problems, were associated with overall hearing-aid satisfaction among a sample of hearing-aid users.
A retrospective research design was employed.
A total of 123 individuals participated in the study (57% male; mean age: 72 yr). All participants owned hearing aids.
A personal details questionnaire and the Profile of Hearing Aid Consumer Satisfaction questionnaire (Wong et al, 2009) were completed by participants, 3-12 mo after they obtained hearing aids. Overall hearing-aid satisfaction was a dichotomized variable (satisfaction vs. dissatisfaction); therefore, logistic regression modeling was applied to the data to determine which variables were associated with overall hearing-aid satisfaction.
Sixty-one percent of the sample reported that they were satisfied with their hearing aids. Hearing-aid satisfaction was associated with the ability to hear with hearing aids and better-than-expected performance in this same area; fewer hearing-aid problems; and fewer problems with hearing-aid manipulation, hearing-aid appearance, and wearer discomfort than were anticipated before hearing-aid fitting.
It is recommended that to improve hearing-aid satisfaction, clinicians should ensure optimal hearing-aid benefit in the listening situations that the person with hearing impairment most wants to hear better; reduce the likelihood of hearing-aid problems occurring; and promote positive disconfirmation (performance exceeds expectations) with respect to both hearing ability and hearing-aid performance through the education of clients about the likely benefits of hearing aids in a variety of listening environments, and the potential problems they could face with hearing-aid manipulation and wearer discomfort.
68.1%至89.5%的助听器使用者表示对其助听器感到满意。人们认为导致对助听器不满的两个因素是产品性能,以及性能与使用者佩戴前对助听器性能的期望之间的差异(即不一致)。关注与满意度相关的因素对于改善听力康复服务具有重要意义。
本研究的目的是确定与听力能力和助听器问题具体相关的助听器性能及不一致性指标,是否与助听器使用者样本的总体助听器满意度相关。
采用回顾性研究设计。
共有123人参与了该研究(男性占57%;平均年龄:72岁)。所有参与者均拥有助听器。
参与者在获得助听器3至12个月后,填写了一份个人信息问卷以及《助听器消费者满意度概况》问卷(Wong等人,2009年)。总体助听器满意度是一个二分变量(满意与不满意);因此,对数据应用逻辑回归模型来确定哪些变量与总体助听器满意度相关。
61%的样本表示对其助听器感到满意。助听器满意度与使用助听器时的听力能力、在该领域优于预期的性能、较少的助听器问题,以及在助听器操作、外观和佩戴者不适方面比佩戴前预期更少的问题相关。
建议为提高助听器满意度,临床医生应确保在听力受损者最希望听得更清楚的聆听环境中实现最佳的助听器效果;降低出现助听器问题的可能性;并通过向使用者介绍助听器在各种聆听环境中可能带来的益处以及他们在助听器操作和佩戴者不适方面可能面临的潜在问题,促进在听力能力和助听器性能方面产生积极的不一致(性能超出预期)。