• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

骨科研究的分散性:骨科医生能跟上研究进展吗?

Scatter of orthopaedic research: can orthopods stay up-to-date with research?

作者信息

Wijenayake Lahann, Conroy Sophie, Turner Douglas, Thorning Sarah, Glasziou Paul

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedics, Tweed Heads Hospital, Tweed Heads, New South Wales, Australia.

Department of Evidenced-Based Medicine, Bond University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia.

出版信息

ANZ J Surg. 2015 Jun;85(6):456-60. doi: 10.1111/ans.12902. Epub 2014 Nov 3.

DOI:10.1111/ans.12902
PMID:25366380
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The volume of orthopaedic literature is increasing exponentially, becoming more widely scattered among journals. The rate of increase in orthopaedics is greater than other specialties. We aimed to identify the number of different journals an orthopaedic surgeon would need to read to stay up-to-date with current evidence.

METHOD

We searched PubMed for all orthopaedic-related systematic reviews (SR) and randomized controlled trials (RCT) published in 2011 using MESH (Medical Subject Headings) terms. The search was based on the Australian Orthopaedic Association syllabus of March 2011. The results of the search were exported to EndNote, then Microsoft Excel. We then calculated the least number of journals needed to read 25%, 50% and 100% of the articles. This was done separately for SRs and RCTs.

RESULTS

We found 1400 orthopaedic RCTs spread over 392 journals. Ten journals contained 25% of the articles, 36 journals contained 50% and 114 journals contained 75%. Three hundred journals contained three or fewer RCTs. We found 354 orthopaedic-relevant SRs spread over 152 journals. Six journals contained 25% of the articles, 23 journals contained 50% and 63 journals contained 75%. Ninety-three journals contained only one SR.

CONCLUSION

Our results demonstrate the vast scatter of orthopaedic research. Four orthopaedic RCTs are published every day. To read even 25% of the new RCTs and SRs published in orthopaedics, a surgeon would require a subscription to 13 different journals monthly, a costly and time-consuming endeavour.

摘要

背景

骨科文献数量呈指数级增长,在各类期刊中分布愈发广泛。骨科文献的增长速度高于其他专科。我们旨在确定骨科医生为紧跟当前证据需阅读的不同期刊数量。

方法

我们使用医学主题词(MESH)在PubMed中检索了2011年发表的所有骨科相关系统评价(SR)和随机对照试验(RCT)。检索基于2011年3月澳大利亚骨科协会教学大纲。检索结果导出至EndNote,然后再导入Microsoft Excel。接着,我们计算了阅读25%、50%和100%的文章所需的最少期刊数量。系统评价和随机对照试验分别进行计算。

结果

我们发现1400项骨科随机对照试验分布在392种期刊上。10种期刊包含了25%的文章,36种期刊包含了50%,114种期刊包含了75%。300种期刊包含的随机对照试验数量为3项或更少。我们发现354篇骨科相关系统评价分布在152种期刊上。6种期刊包含了25%的文章,23种期刊包含了50%,63种期刊包含了75%。93种期刊仅包含1篇系统评价。

结论

我们的结果表明骨科研究分布极为分散。每天有4项骨科随机对照试验发表。仅阅读骨科领域新发表的随机对照试验和系统评价中的25%,外科医生每月就需要订阅13种不同的期刊,这既昂贵又耗时。

相似文献

1
Scatter of orthopaedic research: can orthopods stay up-to-date with research?骨科研究的分散性:骨科医生能跟上研究进展吗?
ANZ J Surg. 2015 Jun;85(6):456-60. doi: 10.1111/ans.12902. Epub 2014 Nov 3.
2
Do orthopaedic journals provide high-quality evidence for clinical practice?骨科期刊能否为临床实践提供高质量的证据?
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2003 Apr;123(2-3):82-5. doi: 10.1007/s00402-003-0501-4. Epub 2003 Mar 22.
3
The 25 most cited articles in arthroscopic orthopaedic surgery.关节镜矫形外科 25 篇被引频次最高的文章。
Arthroscopy. 2012 Apr;28(4):548-64. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2011.08.312. Epub 2012 Jan 20.
4
Orthopaedic Randomized Controlled Trials Published in General Medical Journals Are Associated With Higher Altmetric Attention Scores and Social Media Attention Than Nonorthopaedic Randomized Controlled Trials.发表在普通医学期刊上的骨科随机对照试验比非骨科随机对照试验具有更高的 Altmetric 关注度和社交媒体关注度。
Arthroscopy. 2021 Apr;37(4):1261-1270. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2020.09.015. Epub 2020 Sep 19.
5
Citation classics in pediatric orthopaedics.小儿骨科学经典文献。
J Pediatr Orthop. 2013 Sep;33(6):667-71. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0b013e318296dfb6.
6
Ireland's contribution to orthopaedic literature: a bibliometric analysis.爱尔兰在矫形外科学文献中的贡献:文献计量分析。
Surgeon. 2013 Oct;11(5):267-71. doi: 10.1016/j.surge.2012.12.007. Epub 2013 Feb 1.
7
A quality assessment of randomized clinical trials in pediatric orthopaedics.小儿骨科随机临床试验的质量评估
J Pediatr Orthop. 2007 Jul-Aug;27(5):573-81. doi: 10.1097/bpo.0b013e3180621f3e.
8
Does a "Level I Evidence" rating imply high quality of reporting in orthopaedic randomised controlled trials?“一级证据”评级是否意味着骨科随机对照试验的报告质量很高?
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2006 Sep 11;6:44. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-6-44.
9
The handsearching of 2 medical journals of Bahrain for reports of randomized controlled trials.对巴林的两份医学期刊进行手工检索,以查找随机对照试验报告。
Saudi Med J. 2006 Apr;27(4):526-30.
10
The scatter of research: cross sectional comparison of randomised trials and systematic reviews across specialties.研究的分散:各专业随机试验和系统评价的横断面比较。
BMJ. 2012 May 17;344:e3223. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e3223.