Suppr超能文献

切除至骨后,人类髋臼唇无再生。

No regeneration of the human acetabular labrum after excision to bone.

作者信息

Miozzari Hermes H, Celia Marco, Clark John M, Werlen Stefan, Naal Florian D, Nötzli Hubert P

机构信息

Division of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, University Hospitals of Geneva and University of Geneva, Rue Gabrielle-Perret-Gentil 4, 1211, Geneva, Switzerland,

出版信息

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Apr;473(4):1349-57. doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-4021-z.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Treatment options for a symptomatic, torn, irreparable, or completely ossified acetabular labrum are limited to either excision and/or reconstruction with grafts. In a previous animal model, regeneration of the acetabular labrum after excision to the bony rim has been shown. In humans, less is known about the potential of regeneration of the labrum. Recent studies seem to confirm labral regrowth, but it is still unclear if wide excision might be a surgical option in cases where repair is not possible.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: The purposes of this study were (1) to determine the extent of acetabular labrum regeneration after excision to the bony rim; and (2) to determine whether this procedure results in higher hip scores.

METHODS

We reviewed all patients treated with surgical dislocation for symptomatic femoroacetabular impingement by a single surgeon at one institution between 2003 and 2008, of whom 14 underwent wide labral excision (of at least 60°) down to bone; we used this approach when there was an absence of reparable tissue. Of these 14, nine were available for voluntary reexamination. The mean age at surgery was 38 ± 9 SD years and the mean followup was 4 ± 1 SD years. All patients consented to a physical examination and an MRI arthrogram, which was evaluated for evidence of new tissue formation by four observers. A modified Harris hip score and the UCLA were recorded.

RESULTS

Regrowth of a structure equivalent to normal labrum was not observed on the MRI arthrograms. Six of nine hips had segmental defects, bone formation was found in five, and the capsule was confluent with the new tissue in six. The mean Harris hip score at latest followup was 83 ± 14, and the mean UCLA score was 6 ± 2.

CONCLUSIONS

Resection of a nonreparable acetabular labrum down to a bleeding bony surface does not stimulate regrowth of tissue that appears to be capable of normal function by MR arthrography, and patients who underwent this procedure had lower hip scores at midterm than previously reported from the same institution for patients undergoing labral repair or sparse débridement. Based on these results, we believe that future studies should evaluate alternatives to reconstructing the labrum, perhaps using ligamentum teres, because resection seems neither to result in regrowth nor the restoration of consistently high hip scores.

摘要

背景

对于有症状的、撕裂的、无法修复的或完全骨化的髋臼盂唇,治疗选择仅限于切除和/或用移植物重建。在先前的动物模型中,已显示切除至骨边缘后髋臼盂唇可再生。在人类中,关于盂唇再生的潜力了解较少。近期研究似乎证实了盂唇的再生长,但对于无法进行修复的病例,广泛切除是否可能作为一种手术选择仍不明确。

问题/目的:本研究的目的是:(1)确定切除至骨边缘后髋臼盂唇的再生程度;(2)确定该手术是否能带来更高的髋关节评分。

方法

我们回顾了2003年至2008年间在一家机构由单一外科医生对有症状的股骨髋臼撞击症进行手术脱位治疗的所有患者,其中14例接受了至少60°的广泛盂唇切除直至骨面;当不存在可修复组织时我们采用此方法。在这14例患者中,9例可自愿接受复查。手术时的平均年龄为38±9标准差岁,平均随访时间为4±1标准差年。所有患者均同意接受体格检查和MRI关节造影,由四名观察者对其进行评估以寻找新组织形成的证据。记录改良Harris髋关节评分和加州大学洛杉矶分校(UCLA)评分。

结果

MRI关节造影未观察到等同于正常盂唇的结构再生长。9例髋关节中有6例存在节段性缺损,5例发现有骨形成,6例中关节囊与新组织融合。最新随访时的平均Harris髋关节评分为83±14,平均UCLA评分为6±2。

结论

将无法修复的髋臼盂唇切除至出血的骨面,并不会刺激通过MR关节造影显示的具有正常功能的组织再生长,并且接受该手术的患者在中期的髋关节评分低于同一机构先前报道的接受盂唇修复或少量清创的患者。基于这些结果,我们认为未来的研究应评估重建盂唇的替代方法,或许可使用圆韧带,因为切除似乎既不会导致再生长,也不会使髋关节评分持续恢复到较高水平。

相似文献

1
No regeneration of the human acetabular labrum after excision to bone.
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Apr;473(4):1349-57. doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-4021-z.
3
What Are the Risk Factors for Revision Surgery After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement at 7-year Followup?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Apr;475(4):1169-1177. doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-5115-6.
6
What MRI Findings Predict Failure 10 Years After Surgery for Femoroacetabular Impingement?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Apr;475(4):1192-1207. doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-5040-8.
7
Periacetabular Osteotomy Provides Higher Survivorship Than Rim Trimming for Acetabular Retroversion.
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Apr;475(4):1138-1150. doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-5177-5. Epub 2016 Dec 5.
8
Spontaneous hip labrum regrowth after initial surgical débridement.
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013 Aug;471(8):2504-8. doi: 10.1007/s11999-013-2914-x.
9
Outcomes After Arthroscopic Repair in Patients With Tears of Hypertrophic Versus Morphologically Normal Acetabular Labra.
Am J Sports Med. 2020 Apr;48(5):1168-1174. doi: 10.1177/0363546520907106. Epub 2020 Mar 9.

引用本文的文献

2
[Research progress in arthroscopic treatment of acetabular labrum injury].
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2020 Dec 15;34(12):1607-1611. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.202002161.
3
Indications and Outcomes for Arthroscopic Hip Labral Reconstruction With Autografts: A Systematic Review.
Front Surg. 2020 Oct 16;7:61. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2020.00061. eCollection 2020.
4
Labral augmentation with ligamentum capitis femoris: presentation of a new technique and preliminary results.
J Hip Preserv Surg. 2018 Jan 16;5(1):47-53. doi: 10.1093/jhps/hnx049. eCollection 2018 Jan.
5
The current situation in hip arthroscopy.
EFORT Open Rev. 2017 Apr 27;2(3):58-65. doi: 10.1302/2058-5241.2.150041. eCollection 2017 Mar.
6
Anatomic Labral Repair in the Hip Using a Knotless Tensionable Suture Anchor.
Arthrosc Tech. 2016 Sep 26;5(5):e1089-e1094. doi: 10.1016/j.eats.2016.05.013. eCollection 2016 Oct.
7
Clinical and radiographical results of labral reconstruction.
J Hip Preserv Surg. 2015 Nov 4;2(4):401-9. doi: 10.1093/jhps/hnv062. eCollection 2015 Dec.

本文引用的文献

1
Persistent structural disease is the most common cause of repeat hip preservation surgery.
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013 Dec;471(12):3788-94. doi: 10.1007/s11999-013-3218-x.
2
Correlation of magnetic resonance arthrography with revision hip arthroscopy.
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013 Dec;471(12):4006-11. doi: 10.1007/s11999-013-3202-5. Epub 2013 Aug 1.
3
Descriptive epidemiology of femoroacetabular impingement: a North American cohort of patients undergoing surgery.
Am J Sports Med. 2013 Jun;41(6):1348-56. doi: 10.1177/0363546513488861. Epub 2013 May 13.
4
Acetabular labral reconstruction with an iliotibial band autograft: outcome and survivorship analysis at minimum 3-year follow-up.
Am J Sports Med. 2013 Aug;41(8):1750-6. doi: 10.1177/0363546513487311. Epub 2013 May 3.
5
Spontaneous hip labrum regrowth after initial surgical débridement.
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013 Aug;471(8):2504-8. doi: 10.1007/s11999-013-2914-x.
6
Magnetic resonance arthrography for femoroacetabular impingement surgery: is it reliable?
J Orthop Traumatol. 2013 Sep;14(3):201-6. doi: 10.1007/s10195-013-0227-1. Epub 2013 Feb 9.
7
Revision hip arthroscopic surgery: outcome at three years.
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2014 Apr;22(4):932-7. doi: 10.1007/s00167-013-2373-7. Epub 2013 Jan 18.
9
The accuracy of magnetic resonance arthrography in hip arthroscopic labral revision surgery.
Hip Int. 2013 Jan-Feb;23(1):99-103. doi: 10.5301/HIP.2012.10436.
10
Histologic assessment of acetabular labrum healing.
Arthroscopy. 2012 Dec;28(12):1784-9. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2012.06.012. Epub 2012 Oct 17.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验