Suppr超能文献

关节镜下盂唇修复与选择性盂唇清创术治疗女性股骨髋臼撞击综合征:一项前瞻性随机研究。

Arthroscopic labral repair versus selective labral debridement in female patients with femoroacetabular impingement: a prospective randomized study.

机构信息

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.

出版信息

Arthroscopy. 2013 Jan;29(1):46-53. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2012.07.011.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The purpose of this prospective randomized study was to compare the outcomes of arthroscopic labral repair and selective labral debridement in female patients undergoing arthroscopy for the treatment of pincer-type or combined pincer- and cam-type femoroacetabular impingement.

METHODS

Between June 2007 and June 2009, 36 female patients undergoing arthroscopic hip treatment for pincer- or combined-type femoroacetabular impingement were randomized to 2 treatment groups at the time of surgery: labral repair or labral debridement. The repair group comprised 18 patients with a mean age of 38; the debridement group comprised 18 patients with a mean age of 39. All patients underwent the same rehabilitation protocol postoperatively. At a minimum of 1 year, all patients were assessed using a validated Hip Outcome Score (HOS) to determine hip function, and also completed a simple subjective outcome measure.

RESULTS

All 36 patients were available for follow-up at an average time of 32 months (range, 12 to 48). In both groups, HOSs for activities of daily living (ADL) and sports improved significantly from before surgery to the final follow-up (P < .05). The postoperative ADL HOS was significantly better in the repair group (91.2; range, 73 to 100) compared with the debridement group (80.9; range, 42.6 to 100; P < .05). Similarly, the postoperative sports HOS was significantly greater in the repair group (88.7; range, 28.6 to 100) than in the debridement group (76.3; range, 28.6 to 100; P < .05). Additionally, patient subjective outcome was significantly better in the labral repair group (P = .046).

CONCLUSIONS

Arthroscopic treatment of femoroacetabular impingement with labral repair in female patients resulted in superior improvement in hip functional outcomes compared with labral debridement. In addition, a greater number of patients in the repair group subjectively rated their hip function as normal or nearly normal after surgery compared with the labral debridement group.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level I, prospective randomized study.

摘要

目的

本前瞻性随机研究的目的是比较女性患者接受关节镜治疗钳夹型或钳夹-凸轮型股骨髋臼撞击症时行关节镜下盂唇修复术和选择性盂唇切除术的疗效。

方法

2007 年 6 月至 2009 年 6 月,36 例女性患者因钳夹型或混合型股骨髋臼撞击症接受关节镜髋关节治疗,在手术时随机分为 2 个治疗组:盂唇修复组和盂唇切除术组。修复组 18 例,平均年龄 38 岁;切除术组 18 例,平均年龄 39 岁。所有患者术后均采用相同的康复方案。所有患者至少随访 1 年,均采用髋关节疗效评分(HOS)进行髋关节功能评估,并完成简单的主观疗效测量。

结果

所有 36 例患者均获得平均 32 个月(12 至 48 个月)的随访。两组患者的日常生活活动(ADL)和运动 HOS 评分均较术前显著提高(P <.05)。修复组术后 ADL HOS (91.2;范围,73 至 100)明显优于切除术组(80.9;范围,42.6 至 100;P <.05)。同样,修复组术后运动 HOS (88.7;范围,28.6 至 100)也明显高于切除术组(76.3;范围,28.6 至 100;P <.05)。此外,盂唇修复组患者的主观疗效明显更好(P =.046)。

结论

与盂唇切除术相比,女性患者股骨髋臼撞击症行关节镜盂唇修复治疗可显著改善髋关节功能。此外,与盂唇切除术组相比,修复组有更多的患者术后主观评定其髋关节功能为正常或接近正常。

证据等级

Ⅰ级,前瞻性随机研究。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验