Conesa Maria R, de la Rosa Jose M, Artés-Hernández Francisco, Dodd Ian C, Domingo Rafael, Pérez-Pastor Alejandro
Universidad Politécnica de Cartagena (UPCT), Department of Plant Production, Paseo Alfonso XIII, 48, 30203, Cartagena, Murcia, Spain.
UPCT, Department of Food Engineering, Paseo Alfonso XIII, 48, 30203, Cartagena, Murcia, Spain.
J Sci Food Agric. 2015 Sep;95(12):2510-20. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.6983. Epub 2014 Nov 26.
In table grapes, berry firmness influences consumer acceptance so it is important to avoid berry shattering and dehydration during their post-harvest life. Since studies of irrigation effects on table grape quality are comparatively rare, sensory evaluation aimed to identify high-quality berries obtained under different deficit irrigation treatments. A 3-year study examined the effects of deficit irrigation strategies on some physical quality attributes at harvest, after 28 days of cold storage at 0 °C and after an additional shelf-life period of 3 days at 15 °C. Control vines were irrigated to ensure non-limiting water conditions (110% of crop evapo-transpiration), while both regulated deficit irrigation treatment (RDI) and partial root-zone drying (PRD) treatments applied 35% less water post-veraison. The null irrigation treatment (NI) only received natural precipitation (72% less water than control vines).
Total yield and physical quality at harvest were not significantly affected by RDI or PRD. Only severe deficit (NI) decreased berry size, and this treatment had the most dehydrated berries and the worst sensory scores post-harvest. After cold storage, increased berry shattering of the PRD treatment was correlated with lower leaf xylem abscisic acid (ABA) concentration at the time of harvest. Overall quality, especially stem browning, determined the shelf-life, and longer storage duration tended to diminish treatment differences.
Only NI clusters showed lower quality than their irrigated counterparts. Neither RDI nor PRD had any noticeable effect on berry quality at the end of cold storage and shelf-life, with the slight differences detected between these treatments related to stem browning and dehydration. Sensory results were similar in RDI and PRD, which provided grapes that were more acceptable to consumers than the control. Thus, it is possible to decrease irrigation of table grapes without adversely affecting the physical quality of the berries.
在鲜食葡萄中,果实硬度会影响消费者的接受度,因此在采后阶段避免果实破碎和脱水非常重要。由于关于灌溉对鲜食葡萄品质影响的研究相对较少,感官评价旨在识别在不同亏缺灌溉处理下获得的高品质果实。一项为期3年的研究考察了亏缺灌溉策略对收获时、在0°C冷藏28天后以及在15°C下额外放置3天货架期后的一些物理品质属性的影响。对照葡萄藤进行灌溉以确保水分条件不受限(作物蒸发散的110%),而调亏灌溉处理(RDI)和部分根区干燥(PRD)处理在转色期后用水量均减少35%。无灌溉处理(NI)仅接受自然降水(比对照葡萄藤少72%的水分)。
RDI或PRD对收获时的总产量和物理品质没有显著影响。只有严重亏缺(NI)会减小果实大小,并且该处理的果实采后脱水最严重,感官评分最差。冷藏后,PRD处理果实破碎增加与收获时较低的叶片木质部脱落酸(ABA)浓度相关。总体品质,尤其是果梗褐变,决定了货架期,而较长的储存时间往往会减小处理间的差异。
只有NI处理的果穗品质低于灌溉处理的果穗。在冷藏和货架期结束时,RDI和PRD对果实品质均无明显影响,这些处理之间检测到的细微差异与果梗褐变和脱水有关。RDI和PRD的感官结果相似,所提供的葡萄比对照更受消费者接受。因此,有可能减少鲜食葡萄的灌溉量而不会对果实的物理品质产生不利影响。