Linek Monika, Rüfenacht Silvia, Brachelente Chiara, von Tscharner Claudia, Favrot Claude, Wilhelm Sylvia, Nett Claudia, Mueller Ralf S, Mayer Ursula, Welle Monika
Tieraerztliche Spezialisten, Rodigallee 85, D-22043, Hamburg, Germany.
Vet Dermatol. 2015 Feb;26(1):40-5, e12-3. doi: 10.1111/vde.12169. Epub 2014 Nov 3.
Exfoliative dermatitis has been described in cats as a paraneoplastic skin disease associated with thymoma. There are anecdotal reports of cases without thymoma, with various suspected aetiologies.
HYPOTHESIS/OBJECTIVES: To identify common features, underlying causes, response to therapy and outcome of nonthymoma-associated exfoliative dermatitis in cats.
Retrospective analysis was carried out of cases presented to dermatology referral centres or cases submitted for histopathological examination. Detailed historical and clinical data were obtained and evaluated statistically. Histopathology was reviewed in a blinded fashion by three dermatopathologists, and PCR for herpesvirus was performed.
Eighteen cats fulfilled all inclusion criteria. There was no sex, age or breed predisposition. All cats presented with severe generalized (77%) or multifocal exfoliation (23%); 12 cats were severely depressed. In all cats, thymoma was excluded radiographically and feline leukaemia virus tests were negative. Additional imaging procedures in 14 cats and postmortem examination in two cats did not detect neoplasia. Histopathology revealed interface dermatitis, mural interface folliculitis and sebaceous adenitis indistinguishable from findings in thymoma-associated cases. PCR for herpes DNA was negative. No aetiology was identified. Treatment in 12 cases consisted of immunosuppressive doses of corticosteroids and/or ciclosporin; one responded to antibiotics, one to shampoo, two went into spontaneous remission, and two did not receive any therapy and were euthanized.
Nonthymoma-associated exfoliative dermatitis in cats is clinically and histopathologically indistinguishable from thymoma-associated cases. Most cases benefit from immunosuppressive therapy; therefore, an immunopathological response to an undefined trigger is suspected.
猫的剥脱性皮炎已被描述为一种与胸腺瘤相关的副肿瘤性皮肤病。有一些无胸腺瘤病例的传闻报道,病因疑似多种多样。
假设/目的:确定猫非胸腺瘤相关性剥脱性皮炎的共同特征、潜在病因、对治疗的反应及预后。
对转诊至皮肤科的病例或提交进行组织病理学检查的病例进行回顾性分析。获取详细的病史和临床数据并进行统计学评估。由三位皮肤病理学家以盲法对组织病理学进行评估,并进行疱疹病毒的PCR检测。
18只猫符合所有纳入标准。不存在性别、年龄或品种易感性。所有猫均表现为严重全身性(77%)或多灶性脱屑(23%);12只猫严重抑郁。所有猫经X线检查均排除胸腺瘤,猫白血病病毒检测均为阴性。14只猫的额外影像学检查及2只猫的尸检均未发现肿瘤。组织病理学显示界面性皮炎、壁层界面毛囊炎和皮脂腺炎,与胸腺瘤相关病例的表现无法区分。疱疹DNA的PCR检测为阴性。未确定病因。12例的治疗包括免疫抑制剂量的皮质类固醇和/或环孢素;1例对抗生素有反应,1例对洗发水有反应,2例自发缓解,2例未接受任何治疗而实施安乐死。
猫非胸腺瘤相关性剥脱性皮炎在临床和组织病理学上与胸腺瘤相关病例无法区分。大多数病例受益于免疫抑制治疗;因此,怀疑对不明触发因素存在免疫病理反应。