Mahan Carolyn G, Young John A, Miller Bruce J, Saunders Michael C
The Pennsylvania State University, 209 Hawthorn Building, Altoona, PA, USA,
Environ Manage. 2015 Feb;55(2):508-22. doi: 10.1007/s00267-014-0391-y. Epub 2014 Nov 5.
We implemented an integrated ecological assessment using a GIS-based decision support system model for Upper Delaware Scenic and Recreational River (UPDE) and Delaware Water Gap National Recreation Area (DEWA)-national park units with the mid-Atlantic region of the United States. Our assessment examined a variety of aquatic and terrestrial indicators of ecosystem components that reflect the parks' conservation purpose and reference condition. Our assessment compared these indicators to ecological thresholds to determine the condition of park watersheds. Selected indicators included chemical and physical measures of water quality, biologic indicators of water quality, and landscape condition measures. For the chemical and physical measures of water quality, we used a water quality index and each of its nine components to assess the condition of water quality in each watershed. For biologic measures of water quality, we used the Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera, Trichoptera aquatic macroinvertebrate index and, secondarily, the Hilsenhoff aquatic macroinvertebrate index. Finally, for the landscape condition measures of our model, we used percent forest and percent impervious surface. Based on our overall assessment, UPDE and DEWA watersheds had an ecological assessment score of 0.433 on a -1 to 1 fuzzy logic scale. This score indicates that, in general, the natural resource condition within watersheds at these parks is healthy or ecologically unimpaired; however, we had only partial data for many of our indicators. Our model is iterative and new data may be incorporated as they become available. These natural parks are located within a rapidly urbanizing landscape-we recommend that natural resource managers remain vigilant to surrounding land uses that may adversely affect natural resources within the parks.
我们利用基于地理信息系统(GIS)的决策支持系统模型,对美国中大西洋地区的上特拉华风景与休闲河(UPDE)和特拉华水峡国家休闲区(DEWA)这两个国家公园单位进行了综合生态评估。我们的评估考察了各种反映公园保护目的和参照状况的生态系统组成部分的水生和陆地指标。我们的评估将这些指标与生态阈值进行比较,以确定公园流域的状况。选定的指标包括水质的化学和物理测量指标、水质的生物指标以及景观状况测量指标。对于水质的化学和物理测量指标,我们使用了水质指数及其九个组成部分中的每一个来评估每个流域的水质状况。对于水质的生物测量指标,我们使用了蜉蝣目、襀翅目、毛翅目水生大型无脊椎动物指数,其次还使用了希尔森霍夫水生大型无脊椎动物指数。最后,对于我们模型中的景观状况测量指标,我们使用了森林覆盖率和不透水表面百分比。根据我们的总体评估,在-1到1的模糊逻辑尺度上,UPDE和DEWA流域的生态评估得分为0.433。这个分数表明,总体而言,这些公园流域内的自然资源状况是健康的或在生态上未受损害;然而,我们许多指标的数据并不完整。我们的模型是迭代的,新数据可用时可将其纳入。这些自然公园位于快速城市化的景观区域内——我们建议自然资源管理者对可能对公园内自然资源产生不利影响的周边土地利用情况保持警惕。