Bashir Mustafa R, Huang Rong, Mayes Nicholas, Marin Daniele, Berg Carl L, Nelson Rendon C, Jaffe Tracy A
Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2015 Aug;42(2):305-14. doi: 10.1002/jmri.24793. Epub 2014 Nov 5.
To determine the rate of agreement between the Organ Procurement and Transplant Network (OPTN) and Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) classifications for hypervascular liver nodules at least 1 cm in diameter, and for patient eligibility for hepatocellular/MELD (Model for Endstage Liver Disease) exception points.
This retrospective study was approved by our Institutional Review Board and was compliant with the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act. The requirement for informed consent was waived. This study included 200 hypervascular hepatocellular nodules at least 1 cm in diameter on computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examinations in 105 patients with chronic liver disease. Three radiologists blinded to clinical data independently evaluated nodule characteristics, including washout, capsule, size, and size on prior examination. Based on those characteristics, nodules were automatically classified as definite hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) or not definite HCC using both the OPTN and LI-RADS classifications. Using these classifications and the Milan criteria, each examination was determined to be "below transplant criteria," "within transplant criteria," or "beyond transplant criteria." Agreement was assessed between readers and classification systems, using Fleiss' kappa, intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs), and simple proportions.
Interreader agreement was moderate for nodule features (κ = 0.59-0.69) and nodule classification (0.66-0.69). The two systems were in nearly complete agreement on nodule category assignment (98.7% [592/600]) and patient eligibility for transplant exemption priority (99.4% [313/315]). A few discrepancies occurred for the nodule feature of growth (1.3% [8/600]) and for nodule category assignment (1.3% [8/600]).
Agreement between the OPTN and LI-RADS classifications is very strong for categorization of hypervascular liver nodules at least 1 cm in diameter, and for patient eligibility for hepatocellular/MELD exception points. Interreader variability is much higher than intersystem variability.
确定器官获取与移植网络(OPTN)分类与肝脏影像报告和数据系统(LI-RADS)分类对于直径至少1cm的富血供肝脏结节的一致性程度,以及患者符合肝细胞癌/MELD(终末期肝病模型)例外积分标准的情况。
本回顾性研究经我院机构审查委员会批准,并符合《健康保险流通与责任法案》。无需知情同意。本研究纳入了105例慢性肝病患者,这些患者在计算机断层扫描(CT)或磁共振成像(MRI)检查中发现有200个直径至少1cm的富血供肝细胞结节。三名对临床数据不知情的放射科医生独立评估结节特征,包括廓清、包膜、大小以及之前检查时的大小。基于这些特征,使用OPTN和LI-RADS分类将结节自动分类为确诊肝细胞癌(HCC)或未确诊HCC。利用这些分类和米兰标准,将每次检查判定为“低于移植标准”、“符合移植标准”或“超出移植标准”。使用Fleiss卡方检验、组内相关系数(ICC)和简单比例评估读者之间以及分类系统之间的一致性。
读者间对于结节特征(κ = 0.59 - 0.69)和结节分类(0.66 - 0.69)的一致性为中等。两个系统在结节类别判定(98.7% [592/600])和患者符合移植豁免优先级标准(99.4% [313/315])方面几乎完全一致。在结节生长特征(1.3% [8/600])和结节类别判定(1.3% [8/600])方面出现了一些差异。
OPTN和LI-RADS分类对于直径至少1cm的富血供肝脏结节的分类以及患者符合肝细胞癌/MELD例外积分标准的情况具有很强的一致性。读者间的变异性远高于系统间的变异性。