• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肝脏影像报告和数据系统(LI-RADS)v2018用于评估肝脏病变的评分者间可靠性和一致性。

Interrater reliability and agreement of the liver imaging reporting and data system (LI-RADS) v2018 for the evaluation of hepatic lesions.

作者信息

Abdelrahman Ahmed S, Madkour Sherihan S, Ekladious Mena E Y

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt.

出版信息

Pol J Radiol. 2022 Jun 13;87:e316-e324. doi: 10.5114/pjr.2022.117590. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.5114/pjr.2022.117590
PMID:35892071
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9288199/
Abstract

PURPOSE

The liver imaging reporting and data system (LI-RADS) is a structured reporting system that categorizes hepatic observations according to major imaging features and lesion size, with an optional ancillary features contribution. This study aimed to evaluate inter-reader agreement of dynamic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) using LI-RADS v2018 lexicon.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Forty-nine patients with 69 hepatic observations were included in our study. The major and ancillary features of each hepatic observation were evaluated by 2 radiologists using LI-RADS v2018, and the interreader agreement was allocated.

RESULTS

The inter-reader agreement of major LI-RADS features was substantial; κ of non-rim arterial hyperenhancement, non-peripheral washout appearance, and enhancing capsule was 0.796, 0.799, and 0.772 ( < 0.001), respectively. The agreement of the final LI-RADS category was substantial with κ = 0.651 ( < 0.001), and weighted κ = 0.786 ( < 0.001). The inter-reader agreement of the ancillary features was substantial to almost perfect (k range from 0.718 to 1; < 0.001). An almost perfect correlation was noted for the hepatic lesion size measurement with ICC = 0.977 ( < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The major and ancillary features of the LI-RADS v2018, as well as the final category and lesions size, have substantial to almost perfect inter-reader agreement.

摘要

目的

肝脏影像报告和数据系统(LI-RADS)是一种结构化报告系统,根据主要影像特征和病变大小对肝脏观察结果进行分类,并可选择辅助特征。本研究旨在评估使用LI-RADS v2018词典的动态磁共振成像(MRI)阅片者间的一致性。

材料与方法

本研究纳入了49例有69个肝脏观察结果的患者。由2名放射科医生使用LI-RADS v2018评估每个肝脏观察结果的主要和辅助特征,并确定阅片者间的一致性。

结果

LI-RADS主要特征的阅片者间一致性较高;非边缘动脉期强化、非周边廓清表现和强化包膜的κ值分别为0.796、0.799和0.772(P<0.001)。最终LI-RADS分类的一致性较高,κ=0.651(P<0.001),加权κ=0.786(P<0.001)。辅助特征的阅片者间一致性较高至几乎完全一致(κ范围为0.718至1;P<0.001)。肝脏病变大小测量的相关性几乎为完美,组内相关系数(ICC)=0.977(P<0.001)。

结论

LI-RADS v2018的主要和辅助特征,以及最终分类和病变大小,在阅片者间具有较高至几乎完全的一致性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aeca/9288199/bb2a8a3b687c/PJR-87-47352-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aeca/9288199/dece7d65d846/PJR-87-47352-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aeca/9288199/3be698bbd541/PJR-87-47352-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aeca/9288199/25c96593cb64/PJR-87-47352-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aeca/9288199/4c01ddaff2ae/PJR-87-47352-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aeca/9288199/429ac07e64b1/PJR-87-47352-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aeca/9288199/1d48e06e408f/PJR-87-47352-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aeca/9288199/bb2a8a3b687c/PJR-87-47352-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aeca/9288199/dece7d65d846/PJR-87-47352-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aeca/9288199/3be698bbd541/PJR-87-47352-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aeca/9288199/25c96593cb64/PJR-87-47352-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aeca/9288199/4c01ddaff2ae/PJR-87-47352-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aeca/9288199/429ac07e64b1/PJR-87-47352-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aeca/9288199/1d48e06e408f/PJR-87-47352-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aeca/9288199/bb2a8a3b687c/PJR-87-47352-g007.jpg

相似文献

1
Interrater reliability and agreement of the liver imaging reporting and data system (LI-RADS) v2018 for the evaluation of hepatic lesions.肝脏影像报告和数据系统(LI-RADS)v2018用于评估肝脏病变的评分者间可靠性和一致性。
Pol J Radiol. 2022 Jun 13;87:e316-e324. doi: 10.5114/pjr.2022.117590. eCollection 2022.
2
Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System: Discordance Between Computed Tomography and Gadoxetate-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Detection of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Major Features.肝脏影像报告和数据系统:计算机断层扫描与钆塞酸二钠增强磁共振成像在检测肝细胞癌主要特征方面的不一致性
J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2018 Jan/Feb;42(1):155-161. doi: 10.1097/RCT.0000000000000642.
3
Hepatic Steatosis Has No Effect in Diagnosis Accuracy of LI-RADS v2018 Categorization of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in MR Imaging.肝脂肪变对 MRI 诊断 LI-RADS v2018 肝细胞癌分类的准确率没有影响。
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2024 Jun;59(6):2060-2070. doi: 10.1002/jmri.27783. Epub 2021 Jun 13.
4
Does quantitative assessment of arterial phase hyperenhancement and washout improve LI-RADS v2018-based classification of liver lesions?动脉期增强程度和廓清率的定量评估是否能提高基于 LI-RADS v2018 的肝脏病变分类?
Eur Radiol. 2020 May;30(5):2922-2933. doi: 10.1007/s00330-019-06596-9. Epub 2020 Feb 4.
5
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) versus non-HCC: accuracy and reliability of Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System v2018.肝细胞癌(HCC)与非 HCC:肝脏影像报告和数据系统 v2018 的准确性和可靠性。
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2019 Jun;44(6):2116-2132. doi: 10.1007/s00261-019-01948-x.
6
Inter-reader reliability of contrast-enhanced ultrasound Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System: a meta-analysis.对比增强超声肝脏成像报告和数据系统的读者间可靠性:一项荟萃分析。
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2021 Oct;46(10):4671-4681. doi: 10.1007/s00261-021-03169-7. Epub 2021 Jun 22.
7
Automated CT LI-RADS v2018 scoring of liver observations using machine learning: A multivendor, multicentre retrospective study.使用机器学习对肝脏影像进行自动CT LI-RADS v2018评分:一项多厂商、多中心回顾性研究。
JHEP Rep. 2023 Jul 22;5(10):100857. doi: 10.1016/j.jhepr.2023.100857. eCollection 2023 Oct.
8
Inter-reader reliability of CT Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System according to imaging analysis methodology: a systematic review and meta-analysis.CT 肝脏成像报告和数据系统的读者间可靠性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur Radiol. 2021 Sep;31(9):6856-6867. doi: 10.1007/s00330-021-07815-y. Epub 2021 Mar 13.
9
Increasing the sensitivity of LI-RADS v2018 for diagnosis of small (10-19 mm) HCC on extracellular contrast-enhanced MRI.提高 LI-RADS v2018 对细胞外对比增强 MRI 中小肝癌(10-19mm)诊断的灵敏度。
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2021 Apr;46(4):1530-1542. doi: 10.1007/s00261-020-02790-2. Epub 2020 Oct 11.
10
Rate of observation and inter-observer agreement for LI-RADS major features at CT and MRI in 184 pathology proven hepatocellular carcinomas.在 184 例经病理证实的肝细胞癌中,CT 和 MRI 上 LI-RADS 主要特征的观察率和观察者间一致性。
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2016 May;41(5):963-9. doi: 10.1007/s00261-015-0623-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Concurrent AI assistance with LI-RADS classification for contrast enhanced MRI of focal hepatic nodules: a multi-reader, multi-case study.人工智能辅助肝脏影像报告和数据系统(LI-RADS)对肝脏局灶性结节增强磁共振成像进行分类:多阅片者、多病例研究
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2025 Sep 16. doi: 10.1007/s00261-025-05202-5.
2
Predictors of hepatocellular carcinoma in LR-M category lesions, a multi-institutional analysis.LR-M 分类病变中肝细胞癌的预测因素:一项多机构分析
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2025 Apr 28. doi: 10.1007/s00261-025-04960-6.
3
Role of radiomics in the diagnosis and treatment of gastrointestinal cancer.

本文引用的文献

1
Interreader reproducibility of the Neck Imaging Reporting and Data system (NI-RADS) lexicon for the detection of residual/recurrent disease in treated head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC).颈淋巴结影像学报告和数据系统(NI-RADS)词汇用于检测治疗后头颈部鳞状细胞癌(HNSCC)残留/复发疾病的读者间可重复性。
Cancer Imaging. 2020 Aug 18;20(1):61. doi: 10.1186/s40644-020-00337-8.
2
How high is the inter-observer reproducibility in the LIRADS reporting system?LIRADS报告系统中观察者间的可重复性有多高?
Pol J Radiol. 2019 Nov 18;84:e464-e469. doi: 10.5114/pjr.2019.90090. eCollection 2019.
3
Interobserver Agreement of Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2018.
影像组学在胃肠癌诊断与治疗中的作用。
World J Gastroenterol. 2022 Nov 14;28(42):6002-6016. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v28.i42.6002.
肝脏影像报告和数据系统(LI-RADS)2018版磁共振成像的观察者间一致性
J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2020 Jan/Feb;44(1):118-123. doi: 10.1097/RCT.0000000000000945.
4
The "peripheral wash-out sign" in hepatic malignant lesions.
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2019 Aug;44(8):2937-2938. doi: 10.1007/s00261-019-02034-y.
5
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) versus non-HCC: accuracy and reliability of Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System v2018.肝细胞癌(HCC)与非 HCC:肝脏影像报告和数据系统 v2018 的准确性和可靠性。
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2019 Jun;44(6):2116-2132. doi: 10.1007/s00261-019-01948-x.
6
Accuracy of the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System in Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Image Analysis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma or Overall Malignancy-A Systematic Review.肝脏成像报告和数据系统在肝细胞癌或总体恶性肿瘤的计算机断层扫描和磁共振成像分析中的准确性:系统评价。
Gastroenterology. 2019 Mar;156(4):976-986. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2018.11.020. Epub 2018 Nov 13.
7
LI-RADS Version 2018 Ancillary Features at MRI.LI-RADS Version 2018 磁共振成像辅助特征。
Radiographics. 2018 Nov-Dec;38(7):1973-2001. doi: 10.1148/rg.2018180052. Epub 2018 Oct 5.
8
Validation of Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System 2017 (LI-RADS) Criteria for Imaging Diagnosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma.验证 2017 版肝脏影像报告和数据系统(LI-RADS)标准在肝细胞癌影像学诊断中的应用。
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2019 Jun;49(7):e205-e215. doi: 10.1002/jmri.26329. Epub 2018 Sep 26.
9
Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries.全球癌症统计数据 2018:GLOBOCAN 对全球 185 个国家/地区 36 种癌症的发病率和死亡率的估计。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2018 Nov;68(6):394-424. doi: 10.3322/caac.21492. Epub 2018 Sep 12.
10
White paper of the Society of Abdominal Radiology hepatocellular carcinoma diagnosis disease-focused panel on LI-RADS v2018 for CT and MRI.美国腹部放射学会肝癌诊断疾病聚焦专家组关于 CT 和 MRI 的 LI-RADS v2018 白皮书。
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2018 Oct;43(10):2625-2642. doi: 10.1007/s00261-018-1744-4.