Suppr超能文献

青少年期精神病性障碍的精神病理学中的性别差异。

Gender differences in the psychopathology of emerging psychosis.

作者信息

González-Rodríguez Alexandre, Studerus Erich, Spitz Andrea, Bugra Hilal, Aston Jacqueline, Borgwardt Stefan, Rapp Charlotte, Riecher-Rossler Anita

机构信息

University of Basel Psychiatric Clinics, Center for Gender Research and Early Detection, Basel, Switzerland.

出版信息

Isr J Psychiatry Relat Sci. 2014;51(2):85-92.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Gender differences have often been found in psychopathological symptoms among chronic schizophrenia and first-episode psychosis (FEP) patients. However, many of these studies suffer from methodological problems and show inconsistent results. Furthermore, very few studies have investigated gender differences in individuals with an at-risk mental state (ARMS) for psychosis.

METHODS

Psychopathological symptoms were assessed in 117 ARMS and 87 FEP patients by two observer-rated scales, namely, the expanded version of the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) and the Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS), and by one self-report scale, the Frankfurt Complaint Questionnaire (FCQ). Gender differences were investigated by applying Analyses of Variance using the BPRS, SANS and FCQ subscales as dependent variables, and group and sex as between-subject factors - in a second step by including age, antipsychotic, antidepressant and cannabis use as covariates.

RESULTS

There were no significant gender × patient group interactions, suggesting that gender effects did not differ between patient groups. Women had higher scores in positive psychotic symptoms (BPRS Psychosis/ Thought Disturbance) while men had higher scores in negative symptoms (BPRS negative symptoms, SANS total score, as well as subscales Affective Flattening, Avolition-Apathy and Asociality-Anhedonia). However, the differences did not withstand correction for multiple testing. The results did not change when corrected for potential confounders.

CONCLUSIONS

There do not seem to be any gender differences in psychopathology, neither in ARMS nor in FEP patients, as regards self-reported or observerrated symptoms, when corrected for multiple testing and potential confounders.

摘要

背景

慢性精神分裂症患者和首发精神病(FEP)患者的精神病理症状中常常发现性别差异。然而,这些研究中有许多存在方法学问题,结果也不一致。此外,很少有研究调查处于精神病风险状态(ARMS)个体中的性别差异。

方法

通过两种观察者评定量表,即简明精神病评定量表(BPRS)扩展版和阴性症状评定量表(SANS),以及一种自我报告量表,即法兰克福抱怨问卷(FCQ),对117名ARMS患者和87名FEP患者的精神病理症状进行评估。以BPRS、SANS和FCQ分量表作为因变量,以组和性别作为组间因素,应用方差分析来研究性别差异——第二步纳入年龄、抗精神病药物、抗抑郁药物和大麻使用情况作为协变量。

结果

不存在显著的性别×患者组交互作用,这表明患者组之间的性别效应没有差异。女性在阳性精神病症状(BPRS精神病/思维紊乱)方面得分较高,而男性在阴性症状(BPRS阴性症状、SANS总分以及情感平淡、意志缺乏-淡漠和社交退缩-快感缺乏分量表)方面得分较高。然而,这些差异在多重检验校正后不成立。校正潜在混杂因素后结果没有变化。

结论

在校正多重检验和潜在混杂因素后,无论是ARMS患者还是FEP患者,在自我报告或观察者评定的症状方面,精神病理学上似乎不存在任何性别差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验