• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

生物可吸收支架:关注血管反应和长期安全性。

Bioresorbable scaffolds: focus on vascular response and long-term safety.

作者信息

Scalone G, Brugaletta S, Gomez O, Otsuki S, Sabate M

机构信息

Thorax Institute. Department of Cardiology IDIBAPS: Institut d'Investigacions Biomediques Agust Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS) Hospital Clinic, Barcelona, Spain -

出版信息

Panminerva Med. 2015 Mar;57(1):1-13. Epub 2014 Nov 6.

PMID:25373397
Abstract

Bioresorbable vascular scaffolds (BVS) are considered the fourth revolution in Interventional Cardiology, thus promising to address some of the pending issues with current-generation drug eluting stents (DES). Notably, most of the potential advantages of BVS over other current devices are due to a peculiar vascular response, called "vascular restoration therapy". The emerging data from real-world expanded use registries suggest that BVS use is feasible in a wide variety of patients (from low- to high- risk), and lesions (from simplex to complex). However, few safety concerns with currently available BVS have arised from initial experiences all over the word. Data from ongoing large-scale randomized controlled trials will be able to demonstrate whether BVS improve patient early and long-term outcomes compared to best-in-class DES.

摘要

生物可吸收血管支架(BVS)被视为介入心脏病学的第四次革命,有望解决当前一代药物洗脱支架(DES)的一些悬而未决的问题。值得注意的是,与其他现有器械相比,BVS的大多数潜在优势归因于一种特殊的血管反应,即“血管修复疗法”。来自现实世界扩大使用登记处的新数据表明,BVS在各种各样的患者(从低风险到高风险)和病变(从简单到复杂)中使用是可行的。然而,世界各地的初步经验引发了对目前可用BVS的一些安全担忧。正在进行的大规模随机对照试验的数据将能够证明与同类最佳DES相比,BVS是否能改善患者的早期和长期预后。

相似文献

1
Bioresorbable scaffolds: focus on vascular response and long-term safety.生物可吸收支架:关注血管反应和长期安全性。
Panminerva Med. 2015 Mar;57(1):1-13. Epub 2014 Nov 6.
2
Bioresorbable Stents: Is This Where We Are Headed?生物可吸收支架:我们正朝着这个方向发展吗?
Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2015 Nov-Dec;58(3):342-55. doi: 10.1016/j.pcad.2015.08.011. Epub 2015 Aug 28.
3
5-year results of a randomized comparison of XIENCE V everolimus-eluting and TAXUS paclitaxel-eluting stents: final results from the SPIRIT III trial (clinical evaluation of the XIENCE V everolimus eluting coronary stent system in the treatment of patients with de novo native coronary artery lesions).SPIRIT III 试验的 5 年随机对照研究结果:依维莫司洗脱 XIENCE V 支架与紫杉醇洗脱 Taxus 支架的比较——治疗初发的 native 冠状动脉病变患者的 XIENCE V 依维莫司洗脱冠状动脉支架系统的临床评估。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Dec;6(12):1263-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.07.009. Epub 2013 Nov 13.
4
Meta-analysis of everolimus-eluting versus paclitaxel-eluting stents in coronary artery disease: final 3-year results of the SPIRIT clinical trials program (Clinical Evaluation of the Xience V Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System in the Treatment of Patients With De Novo Native Coronary Artery Lesions).在冠状动脉疾病中,依维莫司洗脱支架与紫杉醇洗脱支架的荟萃分析:SPIRIT 临床试验计划的最终 3 年结果(在治疗新发病变的患者中,使用依维莫司洗脱冠状动脉支架系统治疗的西里斯 V 依维莫司洗脱冠状动脉支架系统的临床评估)。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Sep;6(9):914-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.05.005.
5
Paclitaxel-eluting balloon versus everolimus-eluting stent for treatment of drug-eluting stent restenosis.紫杉醇洗脱球囊与依维莫司洗脱支架治疗药物洗脱支架再狭窄的比较
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 May 1;83(6):881-7. doi: 10.1002/ccd.25072. Epub 2013 Jul 3.
6
Bioabsorbable drug-eluting vascular scaffold for the treatment of coronary in-stent restenosis: A two center registry.用于治疗冠状动脉支架内再狭窄的生物可吸收药物洗脱血管支架:一项双中心注册研究。
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2015 Oct-Nov;16(7):401-5. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2015.07.008. Epub 2015 Aug 10.
7
Clinical, Angiographic, Functional, and Imaging Outcomes 12 Months After Implantation of Drug-Eluting Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffolds in Acute Coronary Syndromes.急性冠状动脉综合征患者植入药物洗脱生物可吸收血管支架 12 个月后的临床、血管造影、功能和影像学结局。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 May;8(6):770-777. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2014.12.244.
8
A randomized comparison of novel biodegradable polymer- and durable polymer-coated cobalt-chromium sirolimus-eluting stents.新型可生物降解聚合物和耐用聚合物涂层钴铬西罗莫司洗脱支架的随机对照比较。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Dec;7(12):1352-60. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2014.09.001. Epub 2014 Nov 12.
9
Two-year clinical outcomes of patients with overlapping second-generation drug-eluting stents for treatment of long coronary artery lesions: comparison of everolimus-eluting stents with resolute zotarolimus-eluting stents.重叠使用第二代药物洗脱支架治疗长冠状动脉病变患者的两年临床结果:依维莫司洗脱支架与佐他莫司洗脱支架的比较
Coron Artery Dis. 2014 Aug;25(5):405-11. doi: 10.1097/MCA.0000000000000098.
10
Comparison of early clinical outcomes between ABSORB bioresorbable vascular scaffold and everolimus-eluting stent implantation in a real-world population.真实世界人群中ABSORB生物可吸收血管支架与依维莫司洗脱支架植入早期临床结局的比较
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Jan 1;85(1):E10-5. doi: 10.1002/ccd.25569. Epub 2014 Jul 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Bioresorbable vascular scaffold implantation in acute coronary syndromes: clinical evidence, tips and tricks.生物可吸收血管支架植入术治疗急性冠状动脉综合征:临床证据、技巧与窍门
Postepy Kardiol Interwencyjnej. 2015;11(3):161-9. doi: 10.5114/pwki.2015.54006. Epub 2015 Sep 28.