• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Targeting transradial approach.

作者信息

Giustino G, Cota L, Chieffo A

机构信息

San Raffaele Scientific Institute Interventional Cardiology Unit, Milan, Italy -

出版信息

Panminerva Med. 2015 Mar;57(1):29-42. Epub 2014 Nov 6.

PMID:25373398
Abstract

Radial access for percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) emerged as a valid alternative to the standard femoral access with the aim of reduce the incidence of access-site bleeding and consequently improve clinical outcomes. Access-site bleeding is still one of the most common complications after PCI and is associated with increased short- and long-term morbidity and mortality. Benefits in access-site bleeding have been consistently observed in high-risk patients undergoing PCI and in particular in STEMI patients where the antithrombotic regimen is more aggressive. Moreover, other advantages with TR access have been reported including better cost-effectiveness, patient preference, reduced in-hospital length-of-stay, earlier patient ambulation, increased safety in patients on oral anticoagulant and the potential for same-day hospital discharge. The benefits of transradial access in PCI led the interventional community to expand its use to endovascular interventions and more recently, to cardiac structural interventions such as transcatheter aortic valve implantation. The aim of this review is to try to give to the reader a wide view of the state-of-the-art of transradial access in PCI and its current use in endovascular and structural interventions.

摘要

相似文献

1
Targeting transradial approach.
Panminerva Med. 2015 Mar;57(1):29-42. Epub 2014 Nov 6.
2
Current State of Radial Artery Catheterization in ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction.ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者桡动脉置管的现状
Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2015 Nov-Dec;58(3):241-6. doi: 10.1016/j.pcad.2015.07.007. Epub 2015 Jul 21.
3
Transulnar versus transradial access for coronary angiography or percutaneous coronary intervention: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.经尺动脉与经桡动脉途径用于冠状动脉造影或经皮冠状动脉介入治疗:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Apr;87(5):857-65. doi: 10.1002/ccd.26221. Epub 2015 Sep 2.
4
Operator learning curve for transradial percutaneous coronary interventions: implications for the initiation of a transradial access program in contemporary US practice.经桡动脉冠状动脉介入治疗的术者学习曲线:对当代美国实践中开展经桡动脉入路项目的启示
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2014 Jun;15(4):195-9. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2014.03.001. Epub 2014 Mar 13.
5
Transradial versus transfemoral approach for coronary angiography and angioplasty - A prospective, randomized comparison.经桡动脉与经股动脉途径用于冠状动脉造影和血管成形术的前瞻性随机对照比较
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2017 Jan 11;17(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s12872-016-0457-2.
6
Transradial versus transfemoral percutaneous coronary intervention in acute coronary syndromes: re-evaluation of the current body of evidence.经桡动脉与经股动脉途径行急性冠状动脉综合征患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗:对当前证据体系的再评估。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Nov;6(11):1149-52. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.08.003.
7
Same versus next day discharge after elective transradial PCI: The RAdial SAme Day DischArge after PCI trial. (The RASADDA-PCI trial).择期经桡动脉PCI术后当日与次日出院对比:PCI术后桡动脉当日出院试验(RASADDA-PCI试验)
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2018 Sep;19(6S):7-11. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2018.05.020. Epub 2018 Jun 2.
8
Randomized comparison of operator radiation exposure comparing transradial and transfemoral approach for percutaneous coronary procedures: rationale and design of the minimizing adverse haemorrhagic events by TRansradial access site and systemic implementation of angioX - RAdiation Dose study (RAD-MATRIX).经桡动脉与经股动脉途径行冠状动脉介入手术时术者辐射暴露的随机比较:经桡动脉入路减少不良出血事件及血管造影X线辐射剂量系统实施研究(RAD-MATRIX)的原理与设计
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2014 Jun;15(4):209-13. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2014.03.010. Epub 2014 Mar 26.
9
Transradial versus transfemoral ancillary approach in complex structural, coronary, and peripheral interventions. Results from the multicenter ancillary registry: A study of the Italian Radial Club.复杂结构性、冠状动脉及外周介入治疗中经桡动脉与经股动脉辅助入路的比较。多中心辅助注册研究结果:意大利桡动脉俱乐部的一项研究
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Jan 1;91(1):97-102. doi: 10.1002/ccd.27087. Epub 2017 May 2.
10
Radial versus femoral access in patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome in the post-matrix era: Still one size does not fit all.后基质时代急性冠脉综合征患者桡动脉与股动脉入路:仍然并非一种方法适用于所有情况。
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2015 Oct-Nov;16(7):435-6. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2015.08.012. Epub 2015 Sep 10.