不切除同步性肺转移灶而进行完整的肝切除是否合理?

Is complete liver resection without resection of synchronous lung metastases justified?

作者信息

Mise Yoshihiro, Kopetz Scott, Mehran Reza J, Aloia Thomas A, Conrad Claudius, Brudvik Kristoffer W, Taggart Melissa W, Vauthey Jean-Nicolas

机构信息

Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.

出版信息

Ann Surg Oncol. 2015 May;22(5):1585-92. doi: 10.1245/s10434-014-4207-3. Epub 2014 Nov 6.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Advances in multidisciplinary care are changing the prognostic impact of colorectal lung metastases. Resection of colorectal liver metastases (CLM) may benefit patients with synchronous lung metastases even when lung metastases are not resected. The aim of this study was to investigate the survival of patients undergoing complete resection of CLM in the setting of unresected lung metastases.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We compared survival among 98 patients who underwent resection of CLM with unresected lung metastases, 64 who received only chemotherapy for limited colorectal liver and lung metastases, and 41 who underwent resection of both liver and lung metastases. Prognostic factors were investigated in the patients who underwent resection of CLM only.

RESULTS

The 3-year/5-year overall survival (OS) rates of patients with CLM resection only (42.9 %/13.1 %) were better than those of patients treated with chemotherapy only (14.1 %/1.6 %; p < 0.01) but worse than those of patients with resection of liver and lung metastases (68.9 %/56.9 %; p < 0.01). Multivariate analysis of patients with CLM resection only revealed that KRAS mutation [hazard ratio (HR) 2.10; 95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.21-3.64; p < 0.01] and rectal primary tumor (HR 1.72; 95 % CI 1.02-2.88; p = 0.04) were independent predictors of worse OS. Survival of patients without these risk factors was similar to that of patients with curative metastasectomy.

CONCLUSIONS

Complete resection of metastases remains the primary goal of treatment for stage IV colorectal cancer. Resection of CLM without resection of lung metastases is associated with an intermediate survival between that of patients treated with palliative and curative intent and should be considered in selected patients.

摘要

背景

多学科护理的进展正在改变结直肠癌肺转移的预后影响。即使未切除肺转移灶,结直肠癌肝转移(CLM)切除术对伴有同步肺转移的患者可能有益。本研究的目的是调查在未切除肺转移灶的情况下接受CLM完全切除术患者的生存率。

患者与方法

我们比较了98例接受CLM切除术但未切除肺转移灶的患者、64例仅接受化疗治疗局限性结直肠癌肝肺转移的患者以及41例接受肝肺转移灶切除术患者的生存率。仅对接受CLM切除术的患者进行了预后因素调查。

结果

仅行CLM切除术患者的3年/5年总生存率(OS)(42.9%/13.1%)优于仅接受化疗的患者(14.1%/1.6%;p<0.01),但低于肝肺转移灶切除术患者(68.9%/56.9%;p<0.01)。仅行CLM切除术患者的多因素分析显示,KRAS突变[风险比(HR)2.10;95%置信区间(CI)1.21 - 3.64;p<0.01]和直肠原发性肿瘤(HR 1.72;95%CI 1.02 - 2.88;p = 0.04)是OS较差的独立预测因素。无这些危险因素患者的生存率与根治性转移灶切除术患者相似。

结论

转移灶的完全切除仍然是IV期结直肠癌治疗的主要目标。未切除肺转移灶的CLM切除术患者的生存率介于姑息性治疗和根治性治疗患者之间,应在特定患者中考虑。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索