Suppr超能文献

依那普利与地高辛治疗充血性心力衰竭的比较。

Comparison of enalapril versus digoxin for congestive heart failure.

作者信息

Beaune J

机构信息

Hôpital Cardiologique, BP Lyon-Montchat, France.

出版信息

Am J Cardiol. 1989 Feb 21;63(8):22D-25D. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(89)90413-x.

Abstract

A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group trial was conducted to compare the effects of enalapril and digoxin on clinical signs and symptoms, as well as exercise capacity, in 142 patients with congestive heart failure classified as mild to severe (New York Heart Association functional classes II to IV). The patients received optimal treatment with digitalis and diuretics for 2 to 4 weeks. Thereafter, they were randomly assigned to receive either enalapril plus diuretics (n = 72) or digoxin plus diuretics (n = 70). After 8 weeks of treatment, a significant improvement in classification was observed in 22 of 63 patients (35%) in the enalapril group and in 17 of 61 (28%) in the digoxin group (difference not significant [NS]). Similarly, duration of exercise increased in both groups (p less than 0.005; p = NS between groups). Blood pressures decreased in the enalapril group (from 129 +/- 19/80 +/- 10 to 121 +/- 20/78 +/- 11 mm Hg; p less than 0.001), but not in the digoxin group (from 134 +/- 19/82 +/- 12 to 138 +/- 19/85 +/- 10 mm Hg; NS). Serum creatinine and electrolytes did not exhibit any significant change from baseline values, except for serum potassium, which increased slightly in the enalapril group (from 4.24 +/- 0.48 to 4.43 +/- 0.49 mmol/liter; p less than 0.05) and decreased slightly in the digoxin group (from 4.28 +/- 0.47 to 4.18 +/- 0.40 mmol/liter; p less than 0.05). Adverse events were reported in 13 patients (5 withdrawals) in the enalapril group and in 7 patients (2 withdrawals) in the digoxin group (p = NS).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

一项多中心、随机、双盲、平行组试验开展,以比较依那普利和地高辛对142例轻度至重度充血性心力衰竭(纽约心脏协会心功能分级II至IV级)患者临床体征和症状以及运动能力的影响。患者接受洋地黄和利尿剂的最佳治疗2至4周。此后,他们被随机分配接受依那普利加利尿剂(n = 72)或地高辛加利尿剂(n = 70)。治疗8周后,依那普利组63例患者中有22例(35%)、地高辛组61例患者中有17例(28%)的心功能分级有显著改善(差异无统计学意义[NS])。同样,两组的运动时间均增加(p < 0.005;两组间p = NS)。依那普利组血压下降(从129±19/80±10降至121±20/78±11 mmHg;p < 0.001),而地高辛组血压未下降(从134±19/82±12升至138±19/85±10 mmHg;NS)。血清肌酐和电解质与基线值相比无显著变化,但血清钾除外,依那普利组血清钾略有升高(从4.24±0.48升至4.43±0.49 mmol/升;p < 0.05),地高辛组血清钾略有下降(从4.28±0.47降至4.18±0.40 mmol/升;p < 0.05)。依那普利组有13例患者(5例退出)、地高辛组有7例患者(2例退出)报告了不良事件(p = NS)。(摘要截短于250字)

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验