Schleepen Tamara M J, Jonkman Lisa M
a Maastricht University , the Netherlands.
J Genet Psychol. 2014 Sep-Dec;175(5-6):451-71. doi: 10.1080/00221325.2014.958126. Epub 2014 Nov 6.
This two-cohort longitudinal study on the development of the semantic grouping strategy had three goals. First, the authors examined if 6-7-year-olds are nonstrategic before becoming strategic after prompting at 8-9 years of age, and if 8-9-year-olds are prompted strategic before spontaneous strategy use at 10-11 years of age. Children 6-7 and 8-9 years old performed two sort-recall tasks (one without and one with a grouping prompt) at two time points separated 1.5 years from each other. Second, the authors investigated whether short-term or working memory capacity at time point 1 predicted recall in children who did or did not use the semantic grouping strategy 1.5 years later. Third, the authors investigated whether prompted strategic children and children who used the strategy spontaneously differed in strategy transfer to a new task. Developmental results confirmed previous cross-sectional results, but in a longitudinal two-cohort study 6-7-year-olds were nonstrategic, and became prompted strategic around 8-9 years of age, followed by spontaneous strategy use at age 10-11 years. The authors found that memory capacity was not predictive of later use of the strategy. New findings were that prompted strategic children were as equally able as spontaneously strategic children to transfer the strategy to a new task, albeit with smaller recall benefits.
这项关于语义分组策略发展的双队列纵向研究有三个目标。首先,作者研究了6至7岁的儿童在8至9岁受到提示后从无策略转变为有策略之前是否无策略,以及8至9岁受到提示而有策略的儿童在10至11岁自发使用策略之前是否受到提示而有策略。6至7岁和8至9岁的儿童在相隔1.5年的两个时间点进行了两项分类回忆任务(一项无分组提示,一项有分组提示)。其次,作者调查了时间点1的短期或工作记忆容量是否能预测1.5年后使用或未使用语义分组策略的儿童的回忆情况。第三,作者调查了受到提示而有策略的儿童和自发使用策略的儿童在策略转移到新任务方面是否存在差异。发展结果证实了先前的横断面研究结果,但在一项双队列纵向研究中,6至7岁的儿童无策略,在8至9岁左右受到提示而有策略,随后在10至11岁自发使用策略。作者发现记忆容量并不能预测后期策略的使用情况。新的发现是,受到提示而有策略的儿童与自发有策略的儿童在将策略转移到新任务方面同样有能力,尽管回忆收益较小。