• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[重症医学十一年核心数据集。疾病严重程度和工作量不断增加]

[Eleven years of core data set in intensive care medicine. Severity of disease and workload are increasing].

作者信息

Bingold T M, Lefering R, Zacharowski K, Waydhas C, Scheller B

机构信息

Klinik für Anästhesiologie, Intensivmedizin und Schmerztherapie, Universitätsklinik Frankfurt, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt a. M., Deutschland,

出版信息

Anaesthesist. 2014 Dec;63(12):942-50. doi: 10.1007/s00101-014-2389-5. Epub 2014 Nov 8.

DOI:10.1007/s00101-014-2389-5
PMID:25376445
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In the year 2000 a working group of the German Interdisciplinary Association for Intensive Care Medicine (DIVI) defined a core data set on quality assurance for the first time. In the following years the participating intensive care units sent data to the registry on a voluntary basis and received an annual report on benchmarking data. Alterations in the quality in the field of intensive care medicine have so far only been published to a very low extent.

AIM

This study analyzed the core date set of the DIVI between 2000 and 2010 in respect to changes in disease severity using the simplified acute physiology score (SAPS II), the sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA), the need for therapeutic interventions with the therapeutic intervention scoring system (TISS 28) and intensive care unit (ICU) mortality.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Inclusion criteria were participation in the registry for at least 4 years, SAPS II, SOFA, TISS28 scores available and data on ICU discharge. A standardized mortality rate (SMR) was calculated for each year.

RESULTS

The mean SAPS II score including 94,398 patients increased by 0.23 points/year with a standard error (SE) of 0.02 to 26.9 ± 12 points (p < 0.001). Similarly, the SOFA score on admission to the ICU increased by 0.14 points/year (SE 0.04) to 3.4 ± 2.7 points (p < 0.001), the proportion of patients with a two organ failure doubled to 7.1 % and the number of patients dependent on ventilation increased by 13.6 % to 59.8 %. The mean time on ventilation increased by 0.17 ventilator days/year (SE 0.01, p < 0.001) to 3.1 ± 7.5 days/patient. The mean number of therapeutic interventions increased by 8.7 % to 26.3 ± 8.3 TISS 28 points/day. The mean length of stay on the ICU (4.3 ± 8 days) and the age of the patients (63.2 ± 17.0 years) remained unchanged. The readmission rate showed no significant changes between the years 2004 and 2010. The readmission rate to the ICU within 48 h after primary discharge was 3.1 % with a 95 % confidence interval (CI) of 3.0-3.3 in contrast to 1.5 % (95 % CI 1.4-1.6) for readmission to the ICU after 48 h. The length of stay in hospital before admission to the ICU decreased for patients with scheduled surgery (6.3 ± 9.7 days vs. 4.2 ± 6.9 days), increased slightly for patients with medically indicated admission to the ICU (2.4 ± 8.2 days 3.1 ± 8.6 days) and remained unchanged for patients with unscheduled admission to the ICU after surgery (4.1 ± 8.6 days). The SMR decreased between 2000 and 2004 from 0.97 to 0.72 and increased again thereafter to 0.99 (ICU mortality 8.5 %).

CONCLUSION

The severity of disease on admission to the ICU, the proportion of patients on ventilation and the workload of therapeutic interventions increased between 2000 and 2010 in German ICUs but the length of stay of patients in the ICU remained unchanged. The SMR decreased until 2005 and increased thereafter to return to the initial values. The overall ICU mortality was low compared to international data.

摘要

背景

2000年,德国重症医学跨学科协会(DIVI)的一个工作组首次定义了一套质量保证核心数据集。在随后的几年里,参与的重症监护病房自愿向登记处发送数据,并收到一份关于基准数据的年度报告。迄今为止,重症医学领域质量的变化仅有非常少的公开报道。

目的

本研究分析了2000年至2010年DIVI的核心数据集,内容涉及使用简化急性生理学评分(SAPS II)、序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)、治疗干预评分系统(TISS 28)进行治疗干预的必要性以及重症监护病房(ICU)死亡率方面的疾病严重程度变化。

材料与方法

纳入标准为至少参与登记4年、有SAPS II、SOFA、TISS28评分且有ICU出院数据。每年计算标准化死亡率(SMR)。

结果

纳入94398例患者,SAPS II平均评分每年增加0.23分,标准误(SE)为0.02,增至26 .9±12分(p<0.001)。同样,入住ICU时的SOFA评分每年增加0.14分(SE 0.04),增至3.4±2.7分(p<0.001),发生双器官衰竭的患者比例翻倍至7.1%,依赖机械通气的患者数量增加13.6%,至59.8%。机械通气的平均时间每年增加0.17个通气日(SE 0.01,p<0.001),至3.1±7.5天/患者。治疗干预的平均次数增加8.7%,至26.3±8.3 TISS 28分/天。ICU的平均住院时间(4.3±8天)和患者年龄(63.2±17.0岁)保持不变。2004年至2010年间再入院率无显著变化。初次出院后48小时内ICU再入院率为3.1%,95%置信区间(CI)为3.0 - 3.3,相比之下,48小时后ICU再入院率为1.5%(95% CI 1.4 - 1.6)。计划手术患者入住ICU前的住院时间缩短(6.3±9.7天对4.2±6.9天),因医学指征入住ICU的患者住院时间略有增加(2.4±8. ...

结论

2000年至2010年期间,德国ICU中患者入住时的疾病严重程度、接受机械通气的患者比例以及治疗干预工作量均有所增加,但患者在ICU的住院时间保持不变。SMR在2005年前下降,之后上升至初始值。与国际数据相比,总体ICU死亡率较低。 (注:原文中“2.4±8.2 days 3.1±8.6 days”之间似乎有遗漏内容)

相似文献

1
[Eleven years of core data set in intensive care medicine. Severity of disease and workload are increasing].[重症医学十一年核心数据集。疾病严重程度和工作量不断增加]
Anaesthesist. 2014 Dec;63(12):942-50. doi: 10.1007/s00101-014-2389-5. Epub 2014 Nov 8.
2
Individual Organ Failure and Concomitant Risk of Mortality Differs According to the Type of Admission to ICU - A Retrospective Study of SOFA Score of 23,795 Patients.根据入住重症监护病房的类型,个体器官衰竭及伴随的死亡风险有所不同——一项对23795例患者序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分的回顾性研究
PLoS One. 2015 Aug 4;10(8):e0134329. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0134329. eCollection 2015.
3
The use of maximum SOFA score to quantify organ dysfunction/failure in intensive care. Results of a prospective, multicentre study. Working Group on Sepsis related Problems of the ESICM.使用最大序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分来量化重症监护中的器官功能障碍/衰竭。一项前瞻性多中心研究的结果。欧洲重症监护医学学会脓毒症相关问题工作组
Intensive Care Med. 1999 Jul;25(7):686-96. doi: 10.1007/s001340050931.
4
Evaluation of the SOFA score: a single-center experience of a medical intensive care unit in 303 consecutive patients with predominantly cardiovascular disorders. Sequential Organ Failure Assessment.序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分的评估:一家医疗重症监护病房对303例主要患有心血管疾病的连续患者的单中心经验。序贯器官衰竭评估。
Intensive Care Med. 2000 Aug;26(8):1037-45. doi: 10.1007/s001340051316.
5
Retrospective evaluation of the simplified Therapeutic Intervention Scoring System (TISS-28) in a surgical intensive care unit.外科重症监护病房中简化治疗干预评分系统(TISS - 28)的回顾性评估。
Intensive Care Med. 2000 Dec;26(12):1794-802. doi: 10.1007/s001340000723.
6
The impact of extracerebral organ failure on outcome of patients after cardiac arrest: an observational study from the ICON database.脑外器官衰竭对心脏骤停患者预后的影响:一项来自ICON数据库的观察性研究
Crit Care. 2016 Nov 14;20(1):368. doi: 10.1186/s13054-016-1528-6.
7
Nursing Activities Score in the intensive care unit: analysis of the related factors.重症监护病房的护理活动评分:相关因素分析
Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2008 Jun;24(3):197-204. doi: 10.1016/j.iccn.2007.09.004. Epub 2007 Oct 31.
8
Early prediction of survival after open surgical repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms.腹主动脉瘤破裂开放手术修复后生存情况的早期预测
BMC Surg. 2014 Nov 18;14:92. doi: 10.1186/1471-2482-14-92.
9
Evaluation of an interdisciplinary data set for national intensive care unit assessment.用于国家重症监护病房评估的跨学科数据集评估
Crit Care Med. 1999 Aug;27(8):1486-91. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199908000-00014.
10
Validation of APACHE II and SAPS II scales at the intensive care unit along with assessment of SOFA scale at the admission as an isolated risk of death predictor.在重症监护病房对急性生理与慢性健康状况评分系统II(APACHE II)和简化急性生理学评分系统II(SAPS II)进行验证,并在入院时评估序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)量表作为独立的死亡风险预测指标。
Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther. 2019;51(2):107-111. doi: 10.5114/ait.2019.86275.

引用本文的文献

1
Analyzing the use of specialized palliative care in intensive care unit patients in Germany: a cross-sectional study.德国重症监护病房患者专科姑息治疗的使用情况分析:一项横断面研究。
BMC Palliat Care. 2025 Mar 20;24(1):74. doi: 10.1186/s12904-025-01718-1.
2
[Functional requirements of patient data management systems in intensive care medicine].[重症医学中患者数据管理系统的功能要求]
Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed. 2024 Apr;119(3):171-180. doi: 10.1007/s00063-023-01097-6. Epub 2023 Dec 13.
3
Avatar-based patient monitoring improves information transfer, diagnostic confidence and reduces perceived workload in intensive care units: computer-based, multicentre comparison study.

本文引用的文献

1
Mortality related to severe sepsis and septic shock among critically ill patients in Australia and New Zealand, 2000-2012.2000-2012 年澳大利亚和新西兰重症监护病房严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克患者的死亡率。
JAMA. 2014 Apr 2;311(13):1308-16. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.2637.
2
Declining case fatality rates for severe sepsis: good data bring good news with ambiguous implications.严重脓毒症病死率的下降:可靠数据带来好消息,但含义模糊。
JAMA. 2014 Apr 2;311(13):1295-7. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.2639.
3
The German quality indicators in intensive care medicine 2013--second edition.
基于头像的患者监测可改善信息传递、诊断信心,并降低重症监护病房的工作负荷感知:基于计算机的多中心比较研究。
Sci Rep. 2023 Apr 11;13(1):5908. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-33027-z.
4
Clinical ethics case consultation in a university department of cardiology and intensive care: a descriptive evaluation of consultation protocols.心内科和重症监护病房临床伦理案例咨询:咨询协议的描述性评估。
BMC Med Ethics. 2021 Jul 23;22(1):99. doi: 10.1186/s12910-021-00668-6.
5
[Health services research in intensive care medicine in Germany : Status quo and future challenges exemplified by acute pulmonary failure].[德国重症医学中的卫生服务研究:以急性肺衰竭为例的现状与未来挑战]
Anaesthesist. 2019 Jun;68(6):343-352. doi: 10.1007/s00101-019-0602-2.
6
[Reimbursement of intensive care services in the German DRG system : Current problems and possible solutions].[德国疾病诊断相关分组系统中重症监护服务的报销:当前问题与可能的解决方案]
Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed. 2018 Feb;113(1):13-23. doi: 10.1007/s00063-017-0390-x. Epub 2017 Dec 21.
7
[Tracheostomy techniques].[气管切开术技术]
Chirurg. 2016 Jan;87(1):73-83; quiz 84-5. doi: 10.1007/s00104-015-0116-7.
8
[Quality assurance concepts in intensive care medicine].[重症医学中的质量保证概念]
Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed. 2015 Nov;110(8):575-80, 582-3. doi: 10.1007/s00063-015-0095-y. Epub 2015 Oct 26.
2013年德国重症医学质量指标——第二版
Ger Med Sci. 2013 Jul 16;11:Doc09. doi: 10.3205/000177. Print 2013.
4
Outcomes of the Surviving Sepsis Campaign in intensive care units in the USA and Europe: a prospective cohort study.美国和欧洲重症监护病房中存活脓毒症运动的结果:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2012 Dec;12(12):919-24. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(12)70239-6. Epub 2012 Oct 26.
5
Intensive care registries and the evolution of the concept of 'quality of care' - reflections from the 10-year anniversary symposium of the Swedish Intensive Care Registry.重症监护登记系统与“医疗质量”概念的演变——来自瑞典重症监护登记系统十年周年研讨会的思考
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2012 Oct;56(9):1073-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2012.02757.x.
6
Development of demographics and outcome of very old critically ill patients admitted to intensive care units.重症监护病房超高龄危重症患者的人口统计学特征和结局的发展。
Intensive Care Med. 2012 Apr;38(4):620-6. doi: 10.1007/s00134-012-2474-7. Epub 2012 Feb 22.
7
Epidemiology and outcome following post-surgical admission to critical care.术后入住重症监护病房的流行病学和结局。
Intensive Care Med. 2011 Sep;37(9):1466-72. doi: 10.1007/s00134-011-2299-9. Epub 2011 Jul 6.
8
Comparison of medical admissions to intensive care units in the United States and United Kingdom.比较美国和英国的重症监护病房的医疗入院情况。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2011 Jun 15;183(12):1666-73. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201012-1961OC. Epub 2011 Mar 25.
9
Nosocomial infections and multidrug-resistant organisms in Germany: epidemiological data from KISS (the Hospital Infection Surveillance System).德国的医院感染和多重耐药菌:来自 KISS(医院感染监测系统)的流行病学数据。
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2011 Feb;108(6):87-93. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2011.0087. Epub 2011 Feb 11.
10
Variation in critical care services across North America and Western Europe.北美和西欧重症监护服务的差异。
Crit Care Med. 2008 Oct;36(10):2787-93, e1-9. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e318186aec8.