Suppr超能文献

外科重症监护病房中简化治疗干预评分系统(TISS - 28)的回顾性评估。

Retrospective evaluation of the simplified Therapeutic Intervention Scoring System (TISS-28) in a surgical intensive care unit.

作者信息

Lefering R, Zart M, Neugebauer E A

机构信息

2nd Department of Surgery, University of Cologne, Germany.

出版信息

Intensive Care Med. 2000 Dec;26(12):1794-802. doi: 10.1007/s001340000723.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the simplified Therapeutic Intervention Scoring System (TISS-28) with its original version, to provide reference values of daily TISS-28 assessment and to describe its association with severity of illness in surgical patients.

DESIGN

Retrospective evaluation of prospectively collected audit data; four documentation periods.

SETTING

Ten-bed intensive care unit (ICU) in a surgical university hospital.

PATIENTS

One thousand nine hundred eighty-six consecutive admissions (1,808 patients; 10,448 observation days) who stayed on ICU for at least 6 h. Patients were in hospital for abdominal, vascular or trauma surgery. The average age was 61.5 years, the mean APACHE II score on admission 10.3 points.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS

Raw data for APACHE II score and TISS were recorded daily. TISS-28 was calculated retrospectively from the original TISS data.

RESULTS

Average TISS-28 values (28.7 points; SD = 9.7) do not differ substantially from the original TISS values (28.2 points, SD = 10.9) and overall correlation is high (r = 0.935). Of the patients, 57.3 % left the ICU after 1-2 days as survivors with a mean daily TISS-28 of 20.0 points. Variability between documentation periods was higher with the original TISS. On average, patients with increasing severity of disease require an increasing amount of care. Survivors have lower TISS-28 values than non-survivors (27.6 vs 34.9).

CONCLUSIONS

In a surgical ICU the simplified version of TISS with 28 items (TISS-28) sufficiently reflects the amount of intensive care provided and may provide useful additional information on severity of disease and prognosis. It should replace the original index, at least in these cases.

摘要

目的

比较简化版治疗干预评分系统(TISS - 28)与其原始版本,提供每日TISS - 28评估的参考值,并描述其与外科患者疾病严重程度的关联。

设计

对前瞻性收集的审计数据进行回顾性评估;四个记录期。

设置

一所外科大学医院的十张床位的重症监护病房(ICU)。

患者

连续1986例入住ICU至少6小时的患者(1808例患者;10448个观察日)。患者因腹部、血管或创伤手术入院。平均年龄为61.5岁,入院时平均急性生理与慢性健康状况评分系统(APACHE II)评分为10.3分。

干预措施

无。

测量指标

每日记录APACHE II评分和TISS的原始数据。TISS - 28是根据原始TISS数据回顾性计算得出的。

结果

TISS - 28的平均分值(28.7分;标准差 = 9.7)与原始TISS分值(28.2分,标准差 = 10.9)无显著差异,总体相关性较高(r = 0.935)。57.3%的患者在1 - 2天后作为幸存者离开ICU,其平均每日TISS - 28为20.0分。原始TISS在各记录期之间的变异性更高。平均而言,疾病严重程度增加的患者需要更多的护理。幸存者的TISS - 28值低于非幸存者(27.6对34.9)。

结论

在外科ICU中,28项的简化版TISS(TISS - 28)充分反映了提供的重症护理量,并可能提供有关疾病严重程度和预后的有用附加信息。至少在这些情况下,它应取代原始指标。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验