Muniz F W M G, Sena K S, de Oliveira C C, Veríssimo D M, Carvalho R S, Martins R S
Department of Dental Practice, School of Pharmacy, Dentistry and Nursing, Federal University of Ceará, Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil.
Int J Dent Hyg. 2015 May;13(2):117-24. doi: 10.1111/idh.12112. Epub 2014 Nov 5.
The use of a toothbrush has a limited ability to control the dental biofilm in interproximal areas. Therefore, specialized devices, such as dental floss, may be useful for these specific areas.
This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of dental floss impregnated with 5% chlorhexidine gluconate on the reduction of the supragingival biofilm.
This research was parallel, single-blind, controlled and randomized, and contained a sample of thirty dental students from the Faculty of Pharmacy, Dentistry and Nursing of the Federal University of Ceará, Brazil, who were divided equally into three groups. The negative control group (NC) did not utilize any kind of interproximal cleaning; the positive control group (PC) used waxed floss without impregnation twice a day; and the test group (T) used the same dental floss, which was impregnated with 5% chlorhexidine gluconate, twice a day. For all groups, this study lasted for 15 days. The presence of a biofilm was evaluated on four surfaces (mesiobuccal, distobuccal, mesiolingual and distolingual) by the Quigley-Hein Index, resulting in four scores for each tooth.
Group T had the lowest plaque scores, showing a significant difference compared to group NC (P < 0.001) and group PC (P < 0.001). Group PC also displayed a significant difference compared to NC (P < 0.001).
It was concluded that the use of dental floss impregnated with 5% chlorhexidine gluconate resulted in additional reductions in the supragingival biofilm relative to the results achieved with conventional waxed floss on the anterior teeth of a well-motivated and well-instructed population.
牙刷在控制邻面区域牙菌斑生物膜方面能力有限。因此,牙线等专用器械可能对这些特定区域有用。
本研究旨在调查浸渍5%葡萄糖酸氯己定的牙线在减少龈上生物膜方面的效果。
本研究为平行、单盲、对照和随机研究,样本来自巴西塞阿拉联邦大学药学院、牙科学院和护理学院的30名牙科学生,他们被平均分为三组。阴性对照组(NC)不使用任何邻面清洁方法;阳性对照组(PC)每天使用两次未浸渍的蜡质牙线;试验组(T)每天使用两次浸渍5%葡萄糖酸氯己定的相同牙线。所有组的研究持续15天。通过Quigley-Hein指数在四个表面(近中颊面、远中颊面、近中舌面和远中舌面)评估生物膜的存在情况,每颗牙齿得出四个分数。
试验组(T)的菌斑分数最低,与阴性对照组(NC,P < 0.001)和阳性对照组(PC,P < 0.001)相比有显著差异。阳性对照组(PC)与阴性对照组(NC)相比也有显著差异(P < 0.001)。
得出的结论是,对于积极性高且接受良好指导的人群的前牙,使用浸渍5%葡萄糖酸氯己定的牙线相对于使用传统蜡质牙线能进一步减少龈上生物膜。