Suppr超能文献

建筑公司职业健康与安全问题持续评估和改进框架。

Framework for continuous assessment and improvement of occupational health and safety issues in construction companies.

机构信息

Department Systems and Quality, MAPNA Group, Tehran, Iran.

Department of Industrial Hygiene, School of Public Health, Hamadan Medical Science University, Hamadan, Iran.

出版信息

Saf Health Work. 2014 Sep;5(3):125-30. doi: 10.1016/j.shaw.2014.05.005. Epub 2014 Jun 17.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Construction industry is among the most hazardous industries, and needs a comprehensive and simple-to-administer tool to continuously assess and promote its health and safety performance.

METHODS

Through the study of various standard systems (mainly Health, Safety, and Environment Management System; Occupational Health and Safety Assessment Series 180001; and British Standard, occupational health and safety management systems-Guide 8800), seven main elements were determined for the desired framework, and then, by reviewing literature, factors affecting these main elements were determined. The relative importance of each element and its related factors was calculated at organizational and project levels. The provided framework was then implemented in three construction companies, and results were compared together.

RESULTS

THE RESULTS OF THE STUDY SHOW THAT THE RELATIVE IMPORTANCE OF THE MAIN ELEMENTS AND THEIR RELATED FACTORS DIFFER BETWEEN ORGANIZATIONAL AND PROJECT LEVELS: leadership and commitment are the most important elements at the organization level, whereas risk assessment and management are most important at the project level.

CONCLUSION

The present study demonstrated that the framework is easy to administer, and by interpreting the results, the main factors leading to the present condition of companies can be determined.

摘要

背景

建筑行业属于最危险的行业之一,需要一个全面且易于管理的工具来持续评估和提升其健康和安全绩效。

方法

通过研究各种标准体系(主要包括健康、安全和环境管理体系;职业健康安全评估系列 180001;以及英国标准,职业健康和安全管理系统-指南 8800),确定了所需框架的七个主要要素,然后通过文献回顾,确定了影响这些主要要素的因素。在组织和项目层面计算了每个要素及其相关因素的相对重要性。然后在三家建筑公司中实施了所提供的框架,并对结果进行了比较。

结果

研究结果表明,主要要素及其相关因素的相对重要性在组织和项目层面有所不同:领导力和承诺是组织层面最重要的要素,而风险评估和管理在项目层面最为重要。

结论

本研究表明,该框架易于管理,通过解释结果,可以确定导致公司现状的主要因素。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/65bd/4213914/85ff7cffe59c/gr1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验