Morris William Z, Henry Havalee, Liu Raymond W, Streit Jonathan J, Grant Richard E, Cooperman Daniel R
*Rainbow Babies and Children's Hospitals at Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH †School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT ‡School of Medicine, Albert Einstein University, New York, NY.
J Pediatr Orthop. 2015 Sep;35(6):593-9. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000000335.
Femoral anteversion can be difficult to determine intraoperatively, particularly in cases with complicated deformity. Although biplanar methodology exists for measuring femoral anteversion, the measurements are generally based on the proximal femur, without consideration for the femoral bow.
We directly measured femoral version in 70 mature cadaveric femora. Using the standard Ogata-Goldsand approach, femoral version was geometrically calculated after measuring apparent neck-shaft angle and the β-angle, which is the angle between the femoral neck and proximal femoral shaft on a direct lateral view. We then used a modified β-angle, measured between the femoral neck and a line representing the entire femur.
Mean anatomic femoral anteversion was 20±11 degrees. Mean calculated femoral version using the standard Ogata-Goldsand technique was 32±13 degrees, whereas mean calculated femoral version using the modified Ogata-Goldsand technique was 22±12 degrees. Repeated measures ANOVA analysis found an overall statistically significant difference between the 3 groups (P<0.0001). Pairwise comparisons revealed a significant difference between directly measured version and the standard Ogata-Goldsand technique (P<0.0001) but not between directly measured version and the modified Ogata-Goldsand technique (P=0.76).
Standard biplanar imaging techniques do not account for the femoral bow and can significantly overestimate femoral anteversion. If a line is drawn from the posterior femoral condyles to the posterior aspect of the greater trochanter, femoral anteversion is better approximated. Intraoperatively, we obtain this line by positioning a marker over the skin under fluoroscopy. Clinically, if one aims for a modified β-angle of 5 degrees, a postosteotomy anteroposterior radiograph is no longer necessary, given the knowledge that with apparent neck-shaft angles ranging from 115 to 155 degrees, version will lie within a generally accepted range between 2 and 11 degrees.
In complex operative cases where imaging is desired to measure intraoperative femoral version, we recommend a modified and simplified lateral view measurement technique, which improves accuracy by accounting for the femoral bow.
股骨前倾角在术中可能难以确定,尤其是在畸形复杂的病例中。虽然存在双平面测量股骨前倾角的方法,但测量通常基于股骨近端,未考虑股骨干的弧度。
我们直接测量了70具成熟尸体股骨的扭转角度。采用标准的绪方-戈尔桑德方法,在测量了表观颈干角和β角(即股骨颈与股骨近端在侧位直视下的夹角)后,通过几何计算得出股骨扭转角度。然后,我们使用了改良的β角,即股骨颈与代表整个股骨的一条线之间的夹角。
解剖学上股骨平均前倾角为20±11度。使用标准绪方-戈尔桑德技术计算出的股骨扭转角度平均为32±13度,而使用改良绪方-戈尔桑德技术计算出的股骨扭转角度平均为22±12度。重复测量方差分析发现三组之间总体存在统计学显著差异(P<0.0001)。两两比较显示直接测量的扭转角度与标准绪方-戈尔桑德技术之间存在显著差异(P<0.0001),但直接测量的扭转角度与改良绪方-戈尔桑德技术之间无显著差异(P=0.76)。
标准的双平面成像技术未考虑股骨干的弧度,可能会显著高估股骨前倾角。如果从股骨后髁向大转子后方画一条线,则能更好地近似股骨前倾角。在术中,我们通过在透视下将一个标记置于皮肤上获得这条线。临床上,如果目标是使改良β角为5度,鉴于已知表观颈干角在115至155度之间时,扭转角度将处于2至11度这一普遍接受的范围内,那么截骨术后的前后位X线片就不再必要。
在需要成像测量术中股骨扭转角度的复杂手术病例中,我们推荐一种改良的、简化的侧位测量技术,该技术通过考虑股骨干的弧度提高了准确性。