Urquia Marcelo L, Berger Howard, Ray Joel G
Centre for Research on Inner City Health (Urquia), Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital; Department of Medicine (Berger, Ray), St. Michael's Hospital; Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (Urquia, Ray), Dalla Lana School of Public Health (Urquia), Faculty of Medicine (Berger, Ray), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.
CMAJ. 2015 Jan 6;187(1):E32-E40. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.140748. Epub 2014 Nov 10.
Infants of immigrant women in Western nations generally have lower birth weights than infants of native-born women. Whether this difference is physiologic or pathological is unclear. We determined whether the use of birth-weight curves tailored to maternal world region of origin would discriminate adverse neonatal and obstetric outcomes more accurately than a single birth-weight curve based on infants of Canadian-born women.
We performed a retrospective cohort study of in-hospital singleton live births (328,387 to immigrant women, 761,260 to nonimmigrant women) in Ontario between 2002 and 2012 using population health services data linked to the national immigration database. We classified infants as small for gestational age (<10th percentile) or large for gestational age (≥90th percentile) using both Canadian and world region-specific birth-weight curves and compared associations with adverse neonatal and obstetric outcomes.
Compared with world region-specific birth-weight curves, the Canadian curve classified 20 431 (6.2%) additional newborns of immigrant women as small for gestational age, of whom 15,467 (75.7%) were of East or South Asian descent. The odds of neonatal death were lower among small-for-gestational-age infants of immigrant women than among those of nonimmigrant women based on the Canadian birth-weight curve (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 0.83, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.72-0.95), but higher when small for gestational age was defined by the world region-specific curves (adjusted OR 1.24, 95% CI 1.08-1.42). Conversely, the odds of some adverse outcomes were lower among large-for-gestational-age infants of immigrant women than among those of nonimmigrant women based on world region-specific birth-weight curves, but were similar based on the Canadian curve.
World region-specific birth-weight curves seemed to be more appropriate than a single Canadian population-based curve for assessing the risk of adverse neonatal and obstetric outcomes among small- and large-for-gestational-age infants born to immigrant women, especially those from the East and South Asian regions.
西方国家移民女性所生婴儿的出生体重通常低于本地出生女性所生婴儿。这种差异是生理性的还是病理性的尚不清楚。我们确定,与基于加拿大出生女性所生婴儿的单一出生体重曲线相比,使用根据母亲原籍世界地区定制的出生体重曲线是否能更准确地区分不良新生儿和产科结局。
我们利用与国家移民数据库相关联的人口健康服务数据,对2002年至2012年安大略省的住院单胎活产进行了一项回顾性队列研究(移民女性328387例,非移民女性761260例)。我们使用加拿大和世界地区特定的出生体重曲线将婴儿分类为小于胎龄儿(<第10百分位数)或大于胎龄儿(≥第90百分位数),并比较与不良新生儿和产科结局的关联。
与世界地区特定的出生体重曲线相比,加拿大曲线将另外20431名(6.2%)移民女性的新生儿分类为小于胎龄儿,其中15467名(75.7%)为东亚或南亚血统。根据加拿大出生体重曲线,移民女性小于胎龄儿的新生儿死亡几率低于非移民女性(调整后的优势比[OR]为0.83,95%置信区间[CI]为0.72-0.95),但当根据世界地区特定曲线定义小于胎龄儿时,死亡几率更高(调整后的OR为1.24,95%CI为1.08-1.42)。相反,根据世界地区特定的出生体重曲线,移民女性大于胎龄儿的某些不良结局几率低于非移民女性,但根据加拿大曲线则相似。
对于评估移民女性所生小于胎龄儿和大于胎龄儿的不良新生儿和产科结局风险,世界地区特定的出生体重曲线似乎比单一的基于加拿大人群的曲线更合适,尤其是对于来自东亚和南亚地区的女性。