Manolis Efthymios, Koch Armin, Deforce Dieter, Vamvakas Spiros
European Medicines Agency, 30 Churchill Place, Canary Warf, London, E14 5EU, UK,
Methods Mol Biol. 2015;1243:255-72. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-1872-0_15.
Since the launch of the qualification process in 2009, the CHMP reviewed/is reviewing 48 requests for qualification advice or opinion (as of Sept 2013) related to biomarkers (BM) or other novel drug development tools (e.g. patient reported outcome measures, modeling, and statistical methods). The qualification opinions are available on the EMA website (Qualification of novel methodologies for medicine development, http://www.ema.europa.eu/ema/index.jsp?curl=pages/regulation/document_listing/document_listing_000319.jsp&mid=WC0b01ac0580022bb0#section2 , 2013). Also there is a trend of increasing numbers of qualification requests to CHMP, indicative of the pace that targeted drug development and personalized medicine is gaining and the need to bring the new tools from research to drug development and clinical use. This chapter will focus on the regulatory experience gained so far from the CHMP qualification procedure. Basic qualification principles will be presented. Through qualification examples, we will elaborate on common grounds and divergences between the different stakeholders.
自2009年启动资格认定程序以来,截至2013年9月,人用药品委员会已审查/正在审查48项与生物标志物(BM)或其他新型药物开发工具(如患者报告结局测量、建模和统计方法)相关的资格认定建议或意见请求。这些资格认定意见可在欧洲药品管理局网站(药物开发新方法的资格认定,http://www.ema.europa.eu/ema/index.jsp?curl=pages/regulation/document_listing/document_listing_000319.jsp&mid=WC0b01ac0580022bb0#section2, 2013)上获取。此外,向人用药品委员会提出资格认定请求的数量也呈上升趋势,这表明靶向药物开发和个性化医疗正在加速发展,以及将新工具从研究应用于药物开发和临床使用的必要性。本章将重点介绍人用药品委员会资格认定程序迄今积累的监管经验。将阐述基本的资格认定原则。通过资格认定示例,我们将详细说明不同利益相关方之间的共同点和分歧。