Birnie Kathryn A, Parker Jennifer A, Chambers Christine T
Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Centre for Pediatric Pain Research, IWK Health Centre, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Pain Pract. 2016 Jan;16(1):46-56. doi: 10.1111/papr.12257. Epub 2014 Nov 11.
Effective use of experimental pain in research depends on a thorough understanding of factors influencing their use. Although studies using the cold pressor task (CPT) have critically advanced our knowledge of pain mechanisms, assessment, and management in adults and children, the impact of identified methodological variability in its use is not known (ie, water temperature and apparatus); furthermore, whether methodological variations differentially impact children across development.
Pain outcomes were examined in 113 healthy children from three age groups (8- to 9-, 10- to 11-, and 12- to 14-year-olds) who completed three CPTs at different water temperatures (5, 7, 10°C) in counterbalanced order. Children were randomly assigned to one of two apparatus (ice- vs. electric-cooled) for all CPTs. Children's hand was warmed to its baseline temperature between CPTs.
Colder water (2 to 3°C decreases) was associated with significantly higher pain intensity and unpleasantness, and lower pain tolerance and threshold. Older children (12 to 14 years) reported significantly worse pain intensity and unpleasantness as compared to 8- to 9-year-olds, likely due to longer pain tolerance. Pain outcomes in 10- to 11-year-olds fell between the other age groups, with significant differences for pain unpleasantness and pain tolerance (at 10°C). Higher pain-related fear and pain unpleasantness occurred with the electric-cooled apparatus. Girls had higher pain tolerance and threshold at all temperatures.
These results provide critically important information about water temperature, apparatus, and child age on CPT pain responding. It informs design of future CPT studies and directs consideration of methodological variability and child age when interpreting study findings.
在研究中有效使用实验性疼痛取决于对影响其使用的因素有透彻的理解。尽管使用冷加压任务(CPT)的研究极大地推进了我们对成人和儿童疼痛机制、评估及管理的认识,但在其使用中已确定的方法学变异性(即水温与设备)的影响尚不清楚;此外,方法学差异是否会对不同发育阶段的儿童产生不同影响也不明确。
对来自三个年龄组(8至9岁、10至11岁、12至14岁)的113名健康儿童进行疼痛结果检查,这些儿童以平衡顺序完成了三种不同水温(5、7、10°C)的CPT。所有CPT中,儿童被随机分配到两种设备之一(冰冷却与电冷却)。在每次CPT之间,将儿童的手加热至基线温度。
水温越低(降低2至3°C),疼痛强度和不愉快感显著越高,疼痛耐受性和阈值越低。与8至9岁儿童相比,年龄较大的儿童(12至14岁)报告的疼痛强度和不愉快感明显更差,这可能是由于疼痛耐受性更长。10至11岁儿童的疼痛结果介于其他年龄组之间,在10°C时,疼痛不愉快感和疼痛耐受性存在显著差异。电冷却设备会导致更高的疼痛相关恐惧和疼痛不愉快感。在所有温度下,女孩的疼痛耐受性和阈值更高。
这些结果提供了关于水温、设备和儿童年龄对CPT疼痛反应的至关重要的信息。它为未来CPT研究的设计提供了参考,并在解释研究结果时指导对方法学变异性和儿童年龄的考虑。