Fineberg Naomi A, Reghunandanan Samar, Kolli Sangeetha, Atmaca Murad
Highly Specialized Obsessive Compulsive and Related Disorders Service, Hertfordshire Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust, Queen Elizabeth II Hospital, Welwyn Garden City, UK.
Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, Firat (Euphrates) University, Elazig, Turkey.
Braz J Psychiatry. 2014;36 Suppl 1:40-50. doi: 10.1590/1516-4446-2013-1282.
Obsessive-compulsive personality disorder (OCPD) is an early-onset disorder characterized by perfectionism, need for control, and cognitive rigidity. Its nosological status is currently under review. Historically, OCPD has been conceptualized as bearing a close relationship with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). In this article, we discuss the diagnosis of OCPD in anticipation of its review for the ICD-11, from the perspective of clinical utility, global applicability, and research planning. Considering the recent establishment of an obsessive-compulsive and related disorders (OCRD) category in DSM-5, we focus on the relationship between OCPD and the disorders that are currently thought to bear a close relationship with OCD, including DSM-5 OCRD, and other compulsive disorders such as eating disorder and autistic spectrum disorder (that were not included in the DSM-5 OCRD category), as well as with the personality disorders, focusing on nosological determinants such as phenomenology, course of illness, heritability, environmental risk factors, comorbidity, neurocognitive endophenotypes, and treatment response. Based on this analysis, we attempt to draw conclusions as to its optimal placement in diagnostic systems and draw attention to key research questions that could be explored in field trials.
强迫型人格障碍(OCPD)是一种起病较早的障碍,其特征为完美主义、控制欲和认知僵化。其分类学地位目前正在审议中。从历史上看,OCPD一直被概念化为与强迫症(OCD)关系密切。在本文中,我们从临床实用性、全球适用性和研究规划的角度,讨论了在对其进行《国际疾病分类第11版》(ICD - 11)审议之前OCPD的诊断。考虑到《精神疾病诊断与统计手册第5版》(DSM - 5)中最近设立了强迫及相关障碍(OCRD)类别,我们重点关注OCPD与目前认为与OCD关系密切的障碍之间的关系,包括DSM - 5中的OCRD,以及其他强迫性障碍,如饮食失调和自闭症谱系障碍(未包括在DSM - 5的OCRD类别中),以及与人格障碍的关系,重点关注诸如现象学、病程、遗传力、环境风险因素、共病、神经认知内表型和治疗反应等分类学决定因素。基于这一分析,我们试图就其在诊断系统中的最佳位置得出结论,并提请注意在现场试验中可以探索的关键研究问题。