Suppr超能文献

单一脉冲序列之间的相互作用:对全神经测量的影响。

Interaction among unitary spike trains: implications for whole nerve measurements.

作者信息

Andresen M C, Yang M

机构信息

Department of Physiology and Biophysics, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston 77550.

出版信息

Am J Physiol. 1989 Apr;256(4 Pt 2):R997-1004. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.1989.256.4.R997.

Abstract

Interaction among action potential trains was examined in electroneurograms (ENGs) from filaments containing several fibers. In an in vitro preparation, increasing aortic pressure generated trains of action potentials (spikes) from regularly discharging aortic baroreceptors. Multifiber records were electronically sorted, and spikes from each separate baroreceptor were identified. "True" discharge rates, measured as the instantaneous frequency of the sorted records, were compared with the results of three quantitation approaches commonly used for multifiber or whole nerve activity in mass ENGs: "spike" counts per unit time, ENG voltage integration, and normalizations of counts or integration. Even in ENGs containing only two active baroreceptors, numerous interactions of the two spike trains occurred. Of 33 paired recordings (66 baroreceptors), 77.3% of the individual baroreceptors had spike trains that could not be clearly discriminated because of interactions with signals from other baroreceptors. Virtually all baroreceptors (96.3%) in nine three-fiber ENGs (27 baroreceptors) showed evidence of missed spikes. Corrected or true spike rates were always greater than activity rates measured by simple counting. Similarity of discharge frequencies in the different baroreceptors was the most important determinant of the rate of voltage signal interaction. Simple count or integration methods underestimated slopes of pressure-response curves and peak activity values by 20-40% compared with sorted instantaneous frequency. Not all coincidence of action potentials in the ENG resulted in simple additions of peak voltages. We conclude that simple counting and integrative techniques substantially underestimate multifiber nerve activity and such quantitation techniques should be used cautiously, particularly in experimental comparisons across groups of animals.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

在含有多条纤维的细丝的肌电图(ENG)中研究了动作电位序列之间的相互作用。在体外制备中,升高主动脉压力会从规律放电的主动脉压力感受器产生动作电位序列(尖峰)。对多纤维记录进行电子分类,并识别来自每个单独压力感受器的尖峰。将以分类记录的瞬时频率测量的“真实”放电率与常用于多纤维或整块ENG中全神经活动的三种定量方法的结果进行比较:单位时间的“尖峰”计数、ENG电压积分以及计数或积分的归一化。即使在仅包含两个活跃压力感受器的ENG中,两个尖峰序列也会发生大量相互作用。在33对记录(66个压力感受器)中,77.3%的单个压力感受器的尖峰序列由于与其他压力感受器的信号相互作用而无法清晰区分。在九条三纤维ENG(27个压力感受器)中,几乎所有压力感受器(96.3%)都有漏计尖峰的证据。校正后的或真实的尖峰率总是高于通过简单计数测量的活动率。不同压力感受器放电频率的相似性是电压信号相互作用速率的最重要决定因素。与分类的瞬时频率相比,简单计数或积分方法使压力反应曲线的斜率和峰值活动值低估了20 - 40%。ENG中并非所有动作电位的重合都会导致峰值电压的简单相加。我们得出结论,简单计数和积分技术会大幅低估多纤维神经活动,此类定量技术应谨慎使用,尤其是在跨动物组的实验比较中。(摘要截短为250字)

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验