Shin D-J, Lee H-E, Bae C-H, Park S-U, Kang H-N, Kim H-H
Species Restoration Center, Korea National Park Service, Gurye, Korea.
Department of Well-being Resources, Sunchon National University, Suncheon, Korea.
Cryo Letters. 2014 Sep-Oct;35(5):377-84.
A comparison of different cryopreservation techniques should be based on the characteristics of both the methodology and the material in question using an optimized procedure.
This study aimed at developing an encapsulation-vitrification procedure for hairy roots of Rubia akane using alternative loading and vitrification solutions, based on the existing optimized droplet-vitrification procedure.
Encapsulated roots were first precultured in liquid medium with 10% sucrose for 3 days, then with 17.5 % sucrose for 1 day, after which they were osmoprotected with solution C6-40 % (20 % glycerol + 20 % sucrose) for 50 min, cryoprotected with solution A3-90 % (37.5 % glycerol + 15 % DMSO + 15 % EG + 22.5 % sucrose, w/v) on ice for 40 min, cooled and warmed in 2 ml cryovials, and unloaded in 35% sucrose solution for 60 min.
Through the application of this procedure to aged-clustered roots, up to 97.5 % post-cryopreservation regeneration was observed. In our previous study, droplet-vitrification of hairy roots of R. akane resulted in 83.8 % post-rewarming regeneration following preculture with 10 % sucrose for 2 days and 17.5 % sucrose for 4-5 h, and osmoprotection with solution C4-35 % (17.5 % glycerol + 17.5 % sucrose) for 30 min, and cryoprotection with solution A3-70 % (29.2 % glycerol + 11.7 % DMSO + 11.7% EG + 17.4% sucrose, w/v) on ice for 20 min. In the present study, higher post-cryopreservation regeneration was observed by using a higher concentration of vitrification solution (A3-70 % → A3-90 %, B5-80 % → B1-100 %) and/or a longer cryoprotection duration (A3-70 % at room temperature (RT) for 8 min → 15-30 min, on ice for 20 min → 40-80 min; B5-80 % for 15 min → 30-60 min).
Even though encapsulation provided some degree of protection from the cytotoxicity of vitrification solutions to cytotoxicity-sensitive R. akane hairy roots, an overall higher post-cryopreservation regrowth was obtained using the droplet-vitrification procedure under optimized conditions. This result implies that this sensitive material was not sufficiently cryoprotected, and thus, rapid cooling and warming using foil strips was more efficient than cryopreservation of encapsulated samples.
不同冷冻保存技术的比较应基于所使用方法和相关材料的特性,并采用优化程序。
本研究旨在基于现有的优化玻璃化液滴法,使用替代装载和玻璃化溶液,开发一种用于茜草毛状根的包封玻璃化法。
将包封的根先在含10%蔗糖的液体培养基中预培养3天,然后在含17.5%蔗糖的培养基中培养1天,之后用C6 - 40%溶液(20%甘油 + 20%蔗糖)进行渗透压保护50分钟,在冰上用A3 - 90%溶液(37.5%甘油 + 15%二甲基亚砜 + 15%乙二醇 + 22.5%蔗糖,w/v)进行冷冻保护40分钟,在2 ml冻存管中冷却和复温,并在35%蔗糖溶液中卸载60分钟。
通过将该程序应用于老化丛生根,观察到高达97.5%的冷冻保存后再生率。在我们之前的研究中,茜草毛状根的玻璃化液滴法在经10%蔗糖预培养2天和17.5%蔗糖预培养4 - 5小时,用C4 - 35%溶液(17.5%甘油 + 17.5%蔗糖)进行渗透压保护30分钟,以及在冰上用A3 - 70%溶液(29.2%甘油 + 11.7%二甲基亚砜 + 11.7%乙二醇 + 17.4%蔗糖,w/v)进行冷冻保护20分钟后,复温后再生率为83.8%。在本研究中,通过使用更高浓度的玻璃化溶液(A3 - 70% → A3 - 90%,B5 - 80% → B1 - 100%)和/或更长的冷冻保护时间(A3 - 70%在室温下8分钟 → 15 - 30分钟,在冰上20分钟 → 40 - 80分钟;B5 - 80% 15分钟 → 30 - 60分钟),观察到更高的冷冻保存后再生率。
尽管包封为对玻璃化溶液细胞毒性敏感的茜草毛状根提供了一定程度的保护,但在优化条件下使用玻璃化液滴法获得了更高的冷冻保存后再生长率。这一结果表明这种敏感材料没有得到充分的冷冻保护,因此,使用铝箔条进行快速冷却和复温比冷冻保存包封样品更有效。