• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

嗜碱性粒细胞活化试验的优化:不同嗜碱性粒细胞识别标志物的比较。

Optimizing of the basophil activation test: Comparison of different basophil identification markers.

作者信息

Eberlein Bernadette, Hann Rebekka, Eyerich Stefanie, Pennino Davide, Ring Johannes, Schmidt-Weber Carsten B, Buters Jeroen

机构信息

Department of Dermatology and Allergy Biederstein, Technische Universität München, Germany, Munich, Germany.

出版信息

Cytometry B Clin Cytom. 2015 May-Jun;88(3):183-9. doi: 10.1002/cyto.b.21203. Epub 2014 Nov 17.

DOI:10.1002/cyto.b.21203
PMID:25399741
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Flowcytometric identification of basophils is a prerequisite for measuring activation of basophils with IgE-dependent or IgE-independent stimuli. Aim of this study was to compare different marker combinations in a simultaneous multicolor flowcytometric measurement.

METHODS

Ten patients with a grass pollen allergy and three controls were included in the study. Basophilic cells were gated by using anti-CCR3, anti-IgE, anti-CRTH2, anti-CD203c, and anti-CD3. Cells were activated by a monoclonal anti-FcεRI antibody, N-formyl-methionyl-leucyl-phenylalanine (fMLP), and the allergen extract Phleum pratense. The activation marker anti-CD63 was used.

RESULTS

The highest relative number of basophils was found with anti-CCR3+ cells, anti-IgE+ and anti-IgE+ /anti-CD203c+ cells, the lowest with CRTH2+/CD203c+/CD3- cells. A very good and good concordance of CCR3+ cells was seen with CCR3+/CD3- cells and CRTH2+/CD203c+/CD3- cells in all experiments. The contamination of the CCR3+ population with CD3+ cells and the contamination of the IgE+-population with CCR3- cells and CD203- cells were the lowest compared to all other marker combinations.

CONCLUSIONS

As the highest relative number of basophils was identified by anti-CCR3 followed by the anti-IgE and anti-IgE/antiCD203c positive population in most cases, these markers can generally be recommended for identification of basophils. If a basophil population with very high purity is needed, anti-IgE should be chosen.

摘要

背景

通过流式细胞术鉴定嗜碱性粒细胞是使用IgE依赖性或IgE非依赖性刺激物测量嗜碱性粒细胞活化的前提条件。本研究的目的是在同步多色流式细胞术测量中比较不同的标志物组合。

方法

本研究纳入了10名对草花粉过敏的患者和3名对照。使用抗CCR3、抗IgE、抗CRTH2、抗CD203c和抗CD3对嗜碱性细胞进行门控。细胞用单克隆抗FcεRI抗体、N-甲酰甲硫氨酰-亮氨酰-苯丙氨酸(fMLP)和变应原提取物早熟禾进行活化。使用活化标志物抗CD63。

结果

抗CCR3+细胞、抗IgE+和抗IgE+/抗CD203c+细胞中嗜碱性粒细胞的相对数量最高,CRTH2+/CD203c+/CD3-细胞中最低。在所有实验中,CCR3+细胞与CCR3+/CD3-细胞和CRTH2+/CD203c+/CD3-细胞的一致性非常好。与所有其他标志物组合相比,CCR3+群体中CD3+细胞的污染以及IgE+群体中CCR3-细胞和CD203-细胞的污染最低。

结论

由于在大多数情况下,抗CCR3之后是抗IgE和抗IgE/抗CD203c阳性群体鉴定出的嗜碱性粒细胞相对数量最高,这些标志物通常可推荐用于嗜碱性粒细胞的鉴定。如果需要非常高纯度的嗜碱性粒细胞群体,应选择抗IgE。

相似文献

1
Optimizing of the basophil activation test: Comparison of different basophil identification markers.嗜碱性粒细胞活化试验的优化:不同嗜碱性粒细胞识别标志物的比较。
Cytometry B Clin Cytom. 2015 May-Jun;88(3):183-9. doi: 10.1002/cyto.b.21203. Epub 2014 Nov 17.
2
Optimizing of the basophil activation test: Comparison of different basophil identification markers.嗜碱性粒细胞活化试验的优化:不同嗜碱性粒细胞识别标志物的比较。
Cytometry B Clin Cytom. 2014 Nov 8. doi: 10.1002/cytob.21203.
3
Analyzing histamine release by flow cytometry (HistaFlow): a novel instrument to study the degranulation patterns of basophils.通过流式细胞术分析组胺释放(HistaFlow):一种研究嗜碱性粒细胞脱颗粒模式的新型仪器。
J Immunol Methods. 2012 Jan 31;375(1-2):30-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jim.2011.09.003. Epub 2011 Sep 14.
4
CD300a is expressed on human basophils and seems to inhibit IgE/FcεRI-dependent anaphylactic degranulation.CD300a 在人类嗜碱性粒细胞上表达,似乎能抑制 IgE/FcεRI 依赖性过敏脱颗粒。
Cytometry B Clin Cytom. 2012 May;82(3):132-8. doi: 10.1002/cyto.b.21003. Epub 2011 Dec 15.
5
Flow cytometry for basophil activation markers: the measurement of CD203c up-regulation is as reliable as CD63 expression in the diagnosis of cat allergy.用于嗜碱性粒细胞活化标志物的流式细胞术:在猫过敏诊断中,CD203c上调的测量与CD63表达的测量一样可靠。
J Immunol Methods. 2007 Mar 30;320(1-2):40-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jim.2006.12.002. Epub 2007 Jan 3.
6
Reliability of basophil activation test using CD203c expression in diagnosis of pollen allergy.使用 CD203c 表达的嗜碱性粒细胞活化试验在花粉过敏诊断中的可靠性。
Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2011 Nov-Dec;25(6):e225-31. doi: 10.2500/ajra.2011.25.3723.
7
Use of lipid rafting for the analysis of human basophil activation by flow cytometry.通过流式细胞术利用脂筏分析人类嗜碱性粒细胞的激活。
Inflamm Res. 2010 Mar;59 Suppl 2:S193-5. doi: 10.1007/s00011-009-0126-3.
8
CD203c-based basophil activation test in allergy diagnosis: characteristics and differences to CD63 upregulation.基于 CD203c 的嗜碱性粒细胞活化试验在过敏诊断中的特点及与 CD63 上调的差异。
Cytometry B Clin Cytom. 2010 Sep;78(5):308-18. doi: 10.1002/cyto.b.20526. Epub 2010 Apr 14.
9
Basophil activation test in the diagnosis and monitoring of mastocytosis patients with wasp venom allergy on immunotherapy.嗜碱性粒细胞活化试验在蜂毒过敏的肥大细胞增多症患者免疫治疗的诊断和监测中的应用
Cytometry B Clin Cytom. 2014 May;86(3):183-90. doi: 10.1002/cyto.b.21148. Epub 2014 Jan 29.
10
Measurement of basophil-activating capacity of grass pollen allergens, allergoids and hypoallergenic recombinant derivatives by flow cytometry using anti-CD203c.使用抗CD203c通过流式细胞术测量草花粉过敏原、变应原提取物和低变应原性重组衍生物的嗜碱性粒细胞激活能力。
Clin Exp Allergy. 2003 Sep;33(9):1266-72. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2222.2003.01756.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Diagnostic Use of CCR3, CD63, CD203c and FcεRIα on Blood Leukocytes of Allergic Asthma and Combined Allergic Rhinitis and Asthma Syndrome.CCR3、CD63、CD203c和FcεRIα在过敏性哮喘及变应性鼻炎和哮喘综合征患者血液白细胞中的诊断应用
J Cell Mol Med. 2025 Jun;29(12):e70594. doi: 10.1111/jcmm.70594.
2
Real-Life Utility of Basophil Activation Test in the Diagnosis of Immediate Hypersensitivity Drug Reactions.嗜碱性粒细胞活化试验在速发型超敏反应性药物反应诊断中的实际应用。
Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2023 Dec;13(12):3229-3239. doi: 10.1007/s13555-023-01069-w. Epub 2023 Nov 28.
3
Towards standardizing basophil identification by flow cytometry.
迈向流式细胞术鉴定嗜碱性粒细胞的标准化。
Front Allergy. 2023 Mar 3;4:1133378. doi: 10.3389/falgy.2023.1133378. eCollection 2023.
4
Towards an FDA-cleared basophil activation test.迈向获得美国食品药品监督管理局批准的嗜碱性粒细胞活化试验。
Front Allergy. 2023 Jan 9;3:1009437. doi: 10.3389/falgy.2022.1009437. eCollection 2022.
5
Basophil Activation to Gluten and Non-Gluten Proteins in Wheat-Dependent Exercise-Induced Anaphylaxis.小麦依赖运动诱发过敏反应中嗜碱性粒细胞对麸质和非麸质蛋白的激活作用
Front Allergy. 2022 Feb 25;3:822554. doi: 10.3389/falgy.2022.822554. eCollection 2022.
6
The Basophil Activation Test for Clinical Management of Food Allergies: Recent Advances and Future Directions.用于食物过敏临床管理的嗜碱性粒细胞活化试验:最新进展与未来方向
J Asthma Allergy. 2021 Nov 2;14:1335-1348. doi: 10.2147/JAA.S237759. eCollection 2021.
7
The basophil activation test differentiates between patients with wheat-dependent exercise-induced anaphylaxis and control subjects using gluten and isolated gluten protein types.嗜碱性粒细胞激活试验利用麸质和分离出的麸质蛋白类型,区分小麦依赖运动诱发过敏反应患者和对照受试者。
Clin Transl Allergy. 2021 Aug 5;11(6):e12050. doi: 10.1002/clt2.12050. eCollection 2021 Aug.
8
Basophils from Cancer Patients Respond to Immune Stimuli and Predict Clinical Outcome.癌症患者的嗜碱性粒细胞对免疫刺激有反应,并可预测临床结局。
Cells. 2020 Jul 7;9(7):1631. doi: 10.3390/cells9071631.
9
Basophil Activation Test: Old and New Applications in Allergy.嗜碱性粒细胞活化试验:在过敏中的新旧应用。
Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2018 Nov 15;18(12):77. doi: 10.1007/s11882-018-0831-5.
10
Synchronous immune alterations mirror clinical response during allergen immunotherapy.同步免疫改变反映了变应原免疫治疗过程中的临床反应。
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2018 May;141(5):1750-1760.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2017.09.041. Epub 2017 Nov 9.