Suppr超能文献

[无创心输出量监测系统对急性呼吸窘迫综合征猪循环和呼吸功能评估的意义]

[The significance of non invasive cardiac output monitoring system on evaluating circulatory and respiratory function in pig with acute respiratory distress syndrome].

作者信息

Bian Weishuai, Chao Yangong, Chen Wei, Wang Lan, Li Liming, Guan Jian, Sheng Bo, Zhen Jie, Zhao Lei

机构信息

Department of Critical Care Medicine, Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Affiliated to Capital Medical University, Beijing 100038, China, Corresponding author: Chen Wei, Email:

出版信息

Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2014 Nov;26(11):799-803. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-4352.2014.11.007.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effect of non invasive cardiac output monitoring (NICO) system in pig model with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), and to provide experimental basis for clinical application.

METHODS

Eleven anaesthetized and ventilated ARDS male pig models were induced by intravenously infusing 0.2 mL/kg oleic acid. Lung recruitment was condocted by pressure control ventilation on pigs with ARDS. The optimal positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) was determined by optimal dead space fraction [the ratio of dead space to tidal volume (VD/VT)]. Cardiac output (CO) was determined by NICO, the respiratory function was monitored, and the VD/VT, dynamic compliance (Cdyn), oxygenation index (PaO₂/FiO₂), the volume of alveolar ventilation (Valv) and arterial blood oxygen saturation (SaO₂) were recorded before infusing oleic acid, after stabilization of ARDS model and at optimal PEEP level, and the intrapulmonary shunt fraction (Qs/Qt) was calculated. CO was also determined by application of pulse indicated continuous cardiac output (PiCCO), and the linear regression analysis between CO determined by NICO and CO determined by PiCCO was conducted.

RESULTS

Seven experimental ARDS pigs model were successfully established. The optimal PEEP identified by the lowest VD/VT method was (15.71 ± 1.80) cmH₂O (1 cmH₂O = 0.098 kPa). Compared with before infusing oleic acid, VD/VT and Qs/Qt after stabilization of ARDS model were significantly increased [VD/VT: (72.29 ± 8.58)% vs. (56.00 ± 11.06)%, Qs/Qt: (21.04 ± 15.05)% vs. (2.00 ± 1.32)%, both P<0.05], and SaO₂and Valv were significantly decreased [SaO₂: 0.888 ± 0.108 vs. 0.999 ± 0.053, Valv (mL): 92.06 ± 35.22 vs. 146.11 ± 45.43, both P<0.05]. VD/VT, Qs/Qt, SaO₂and Cdyn at optimal PEEP level were improved to the levels before infusing oleic acid [(61.07 ± 9.30)%, (3.21 ± 6.10)%, 0.989 ± 0.025, (117.14 ± 41.14)mL]. Cdyn and PaO₂/FiO₂after stabilization of ARDS model were significantly lowered compared with those before infusing oleic acid [Cdyn (mL/cmH₂O): 14.43 ± 5.50 vs. 38.14 ± 6.72, PaO₂/FiO₂(mmHg, 1 mmHg = 0.133 kPa): 78.71 ± 23.22 vs. 564.37 ± 158.85, both P < 0.05]. Cdyn and PaO₂/FiO₂at optimal PEEP level [(19.71 ± 4.86)%, (375.49 ± 141.30) mmHg] were elevated compared with the levels after stabilization of ARDS model (both P <0 .05), but still lower than those before infusing oleic acid (both P < 0.05). Compared with the levels after stabilization of ARDS model, CO at optimal PEEP level showed obvious decrease from (4.18 ± 2.46) L/min to (3.95 ± 2.69) L/min without significant difference (P > 0.05). There was linear correlation between CO determined by NICO and CO determined by PiCCO (r²=0.925, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

NICO technique provides a useful and accurate non invasive estimation of CO and respiratory function.VD/VT provided by NICO can titrate the optimal PEEP in patients with ARDS.

摘要

目的

探讨无创心输出量监测(NICO)系统在急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)猪模型中的作用,为临床应用提供实验依据。

方法

通过静脉注射0.2 mL/kg油酸诱导11只麻醉通气的雄性ARDS猪模型。对ARDS猪采用压力控制通气进行肺复张。根据最佳死腔分数[死腔与潮气量之比(VD/VT)]确定最佳呼气末正压(PEEP)。采用NICO测定心输出量(CO),监测呼吸功能,记录注入油酸前、ARDS模型稳定后及最佳PEEP水平时的VD/VT、动态顺应性(Cdyn)、氧合指数(PaO₂/FiO₂)、肺泡通气量(Valv)和动脉血氧饱和度(SaO₂),并计算肺内分流分数(Qs/Qt)。同时应用脉搏指示连续心输出量(PiCCO)测定CO,并对NICO测定的CO与PiCCO测定的CO进行线性回归分析。

结果

成功建立7个实验性ARDS猪模型。采用最低VD/VT法确定的最佳PEEP为(15.71±1.80)cmH₂O(1 cmH₂O = 0.098 kPa)。与注入油酸前相比,ARDS模型稳定后VD/VT和Qs/Qt显著升高[VD/VT:(72.29±8.58)%对(56.00±11.06)%,Qs/Qt:(21.04±15.05)%对(2.00±1.32)%,均P<0.05],而SaO₂和Valv显著降低[SaO₂:0.888±0.108对0.999±0.053,Valv(mL):92.06±35.22对146.11±45.43,均P<0.05]。最佳PEEP水平时的VD/VT、Qs/Qt、SaO₂和Cdyn改善至注入油酸前水平[(61.07±9.30)%,(3.21±6.10)%,0.989±0.025,(117.14±41.14)mL]。ARDS模型稳定后的Cdyn和PaO₂/FiO₂与注入油酸前相比显著降低[Cdyn(mL/cmH₂O):14.43±5.50对38.14±6.72,PaO₂/FiO₂(mmHg,1 mmHg = 0.133 kPa):78.71±23.22对564.37±158.85,均P<0.05]。最佳PEEP水平时的Cdyn和PaO₂/FiO₂[(19.71±4.86)%,(375.49±141.30)mmHg]较ARDS模型稳定后升高(均P<0.05),但仍低于注入油酸前(均P<0.05)。与ARDS模型稳定后相比,最佳PEEP水平时的CO明显降低,从(4.18±2.46)L/min降至(3.95±2.69)L/min,但差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。NICO测定的CO与PiCCO测定的CO之间存在线性相关性(r²=0.925,P<0.001)。

结论

NICO技术可有效、准确地无创评估CO及呼吸功能。NICO提供的VD/VT可用于滴定ARDS患者的最佳PEEP。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验