Suppr超能文献

经肺复张压力指导的呼气末正压滴定对急性呼吸窘迫综合征猪肺损伤的影响。

Effect of transpulmonary pressure-guided positive end-expiratory pressure titration on lung injury in pigs with acute respiratory distress syndrome.

机构信息

Department of Critical Care Medicine, Clinical Medical College, YangZhou University, Northern Jiangsu People's Hospital, Yangzhou, 225001, Jiangsu, China.

Department of Neurology, Clinical Medical College, Wutaishan Hospital, YangZhou University, Yangzhou, 225001, Jiangsu, China.

出版信息

J Clin Monit Comput. 2020 Feb;34(1):151-159. doi: 10.1007/s10877-019-00267-2. Epub 2019 Mar 22.

Abstract

To investigate the effect of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) guided by transpulmonary pressure or with maximum oxygenation-directed PEEP on lung injury in a porcine model of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). The porcine model of ARDS was induced in 12 standard pigs by intratracheal infusion with normal saline. The pigs were then randomly divided into two groups who were ventilated with the lung-protective strategy of low tidal volume (VT) (6 ml/kg), using different methods to titrate PEEP level: transpulmonary pressure (TP group; n = 6) or maximum oxygenation (MO group; n = 6). Gas exchange, pulmonary mechanics, and hemodynamics were determined and pulmonary inflammatory response indices were measured after 4 h of ventilation. The titrated PEEP level in the TP group (6.12 ± 0.89 cmHO) was significantly lower than that in the MO group (11.33 ± 2.07 cmH2O) (P < 0.05). The PaO/FiO (P/F) after PEEP titration both improved in the TP and MO groups as compared with that at T0 (when the criteria for ARDS were obtained). The P/F in the TP group did not differ significantly from that in the MO group during the 4 h of ventilation (P > 0.05). Respiratory system compliance and lung compliance were significantly improved in the TP group compared to the MO group (P < 0.05). The VD/VT in the TP group was significantly lower than that in the MO group after 4 h of ventilation (P < 0.05). Central venous pressure increased and the cardiac index decreased significantly in the MO group as compared with the TP group (P < 0.05), whereas oxygen delivery did not differ significantly between the groups (P > 0.05). The pulmonary vascular permeability index and the extravascular lung water index in the TP group were significantly lower than those in the MO group (P < 0.05). The TP group had a lower lung wet to dry weight ratio, lung injury score, and MPO, TNF-, and IL-8 concentrations than the MO group (P < 0.05). In summary, in a pig model of ARDS, ventilation with low VT and transpulmonary pressure-guided PEEP adjustment was associated with improved compliance, reduced dead space ventilation, increased cardiac output, and relieved lung injury, as compared to maximum oxygenation-guide PEEP adjustment.

摘要

目的

探讨经肺压力或最大氧合导向呼气末正压(PEEP)指导的 PEEP 对急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)猪模型肺损伤的影响。

方法

通过气管内输注生理盐水,在 12 头标准猪中诱导 ARDS 模型。然后,将猪随机分为两组,采用低潮气量(VT)(6ml/kg)的肺保护性策略进行通气,采用不同的方法滴定 PEEP 水平:经肺压力(TP 组;n=6)或最大氧合(MO 组;n=6)。通气 4 小时后,测定气体交换、肺力学和血流动力学,并测量肺炎症反应指标。TP 组(6.12±0.89cmH2O)的滴定 PEEP 水平明显低于 MO 组(11.33±2.07cmH2O)(P<0.05)。与 T0 时(ARDS 标准获得时)相比,TP 和 MO 组在 PEEP 滴定后 PaO/FiO(P/F)均有所改善。在通气 4 小时期间,TP 组的 P/F 与 MO 组无显著差异(P>0.05)。与 MO 组相比,TP 组的呼吸系统顺应性和肺顺应性明显改善(P<0.05)。与 TP 组相比,MO 组通气 4 小时后 VD/VT 明显升高(P<0.05)。与 TP 组相比,MO 组中心静脉压升高,心指数降低(P<0.05),而两组间氧输送无显著差异(P>0.05)。TP 组肺血管通透性指数和血管外肺水指数明显低于 MO 组(P<0.05)。TP 组肺湿重/干重比、肺损伤评分和 MPO、TNF-α和 IL-8 浓度均低于 MO 组(P<0.05)。

结论

在 ARDS 猪模型中,与最大氧合指导的 PEEP 调整相比,采用低 VT 和经肺压力指导的 PEEP 调整的通气与改善顺应性、减少死腔通气、增加心输出量和减轻肺损伤有关。

相似文献

4
Pulmonary acute respiratory distress syndrome: positive end-expiratory pressure titration needs stress index.
J Surg Res. 2013 Nov;185(1):347-52. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2013.05.012. Epub 2013 May 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Postoperative hypoxemia for patients undergoing Stanford type A aortic dissection.
World J Clin Cases. 2023 May 16;11(14):3140-3147. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v11.i14.3140.
2
What is new in respiratory monitoring?
J Clin Monit Comput. 2022 Jun;36(3):599-607. doi: 10.1007/s10877-022-00876-4. Epub 2022 May 13.

本文引用的文献

1
Esophageal Manometry and Regional Transpulmonary Pressure in Lung Injury.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2018 Apr 15;197(8):1018-1026. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201709-1806OC.
2
Fifty Years of Research in ARDS. Setting Positive End-Expiratory Pressure in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2017 Jun 1;195(11):1429-1438. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201610-2035CI.
3
Endothelial cell signaling and ventilator-induced lung injury: molecular mechanisms, genomic analyses, and therapeutic targets.
Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2017 Apr 1;312(4):L452-L476. doi: 10.1152/ajplung.00231.2016. Epub 2016 Dec 15.
4
Ventilator-induced Lung Injury.
Clin Chest Med. 2016 Dec;37(4):633-646. doi: 10.1016/j.ccm.2016.07.004. Epub 2016 Oct 14.
5
The application of esophageal pressure measurement in patients with respiratory failure.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2014 Mar 1;189(5):520-31. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201312-2193CI.
6
Measurement of esophageal pressure at bedside: pros and cons.
Curr Opin Crit Care. 2014 Feb;20(1):39-46. doi: 10.1097/MCC.0000000000000050.
8
Inflammatory mechanisms of ventilator-induced lung injury: a time to stop and think?
Anaesthesia. 2013 Feb;68(2):175-8. doi: 10.1111/anae.12085. Epub 2012 Nov 22.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验