Connor Carol McDonald, Spencer Mercedes, Day Stephanie L, Giuliani Sarah, Ingebrand Sarah W, McLean Leigh, Morrison Frederick J
Arizona State University and the Learning Sciences Institute.
Florida State University and the Florida Center for Reading Research.
J Educ Psychol. 2014 Aug;106(3):762-778. doi: 10.1037/a0035921.
We examined classrooms as complex systems that affect students' literacy learning through interacting effects of content and amount of time individual students spent in literacy instruction along with the global quality of the classroom-learning environment. We observed 27 third grade classrooms serving 315 target students using two different observation systems. The first assessed instruction at a more micro-level; specifically, the amount of time individual students spent in literacy instruction defined by the type of instruction, role of the teacher, and content. The second assessed the quality of the classroom-learning environment at a more macro level focusing on classroom organization, teacher responsiveness, and support for vocabulary and language. Results revealed that both global quality of the classroom learning environment and time individual students spent in specific types of literacy instruction covering specific content interacted to predict students' comprehension and vocabulary gains whereas neither system alone did. These findings support a dynamic systems model of how individual children learn in the context of classroom literacy instruction and the classroom-learning environment, which can help to improve observations systems, advance research, elevate teacher evaluation and professional development, and enhance student achievement.
我们将课堂视为复杂系统,其通过个体学生在读写教学中所花费的时间和内容的交互作用,以及课堂学习环境的整体质量,来影响学生的读写能力学习。我们使用两种不同的观察系统,对为315名目标学生授课的27间三年级教室进行了观察。第一种系统在更微观的层面评估教学;具体而言,即个体学生在读写教学中所花费的时间,这由教学类型、教师角色和内容来界定。第二种系统在更宏观的层面评估课堂学习环境的质量,重点关注课堂组织、教师反应能力以及对词汇和语言的支持。结果显示,课堂学习环境的整体质量以及个体学生在涵盖特定内容的特定类型读写教学中所花费的时间,二者相互作用,能够预测学生在阅读理解和词汇方面的进步,而单独任何一个系统都无法做到这一点。这些发现支持了一个动态系统模型,该模型阐述了个体儿童在课堂读写教学及课堂学习环境背景下是如何学习的,这有助于改进观察系统、推动研究、提升教师评估和专业发展,并提高学生成绩。