Rusconi Elena, Mitchener-Nissen Timothy
Department of Security and Crime Science, University College London London, UK ; Division of Psychology, Abertay University Dundee, UK ; Department of Neurosciences, University of Parma Parma, Italy.
Department of Science and Technology Studies, University College London London, UK.
Front Syst Neurosci. 2014 Oct 31;8:214. doi: 10.3389/fnsys.2014.00214. eCollection 2014.
The production of expectations or future-goals for the development of techniques which "read" and modulate brain function, represent an important practical tool for neuroscientists. These visions-of-the-future assist scientists by providing focus for both individual and cross-disciplinary research programs; they encourage the development of new industrial sectors, are used to justify the allocation of government resources and funding, and via the media can help capture the imagination and support of the public. However, such expectations need to be tempered by reality. Over-hyping brain imaging and modulation will lead to disappointment; disappointment that in turn can undermine its potential. Similarly, if neuroscientists focus their attention narrowly on the science without concomitant consideration of its future ethical, legal and social implications, then their expectations may remain unrealized. To develop these arguments herein we introduce the theoretical concept of expectations and the practical consequences of expectations. We contextualize these reflections by referring to brain imaging and modulation studies on deception, which encompass the measurement-suppression-augmentation range.
对“读取”和调节脑功能技术发展的期望或未来目标的产生,对神经科学家而言是一种重要的实用工具。这些对未来的设想通过为个体研究项目和跨学科研究项目提供重点来帮助科学家;它们鼓励新产业部门的发展,被用于证明政府资源和资金分配的合理性,并且通过媒体能够帮助吸引公众的想象力并获得公众的支持。然而,这样的期望需要受到现实的约束。过度炒作脑成像和调节技术将会导致失望;而这种失望反过来又可能损害其潜力。同样,如果神经科学家将注意力狭隘地集中在科学上,而不随之考虑其未来的伦理、法律和社会影响,那么他们的期望可能无法实现。为了在此阐述这些观点,我们引入期望的理论概念以及期望的实际后果。我们通过提及关于欺骗的脑成像和调节研究来将这些思考置于具体情境中,这些研究涵盖了测量 - 抑制 - 增强范围。