Eberhardt Silvio P, Auer Edward T, Bernstein Lynne E
Communication Neuroscience Laboratory, Department of Speech and Hearing Sciences, George Washington University Washington, DC, USA.
Front Hum Neurosci. 2014 Oct 31;8:829. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00829. eCollection 2014.
In a series of studies we have been investigating how multisensory training affects unisensory perceptual learning with speech stimuli. Previously, we reported that audiovisual (AV) training with speech stimuli can promote auditory-only (AO) perceptual learning in normal-hearing adults but can impede learning in congenitally deaf adults with late-acquired cochlear implants. Here, impeder and promoter effects were sought in normal-hearing adults who participated in lipreading training. In Experiment 1, visual-only (VO) training on paired associations between CVCVC nonsense word videos and nonsense pictures demonstrated that VO words could be learned to a high level of accuracy even by poor lipreaders. In Experiment 2, visual-auditory (VA) training in the same paradigm but with the addition of synchronous vocoded acoustic speech impeded VO learning of the stimuli in the paired-associates paradigm. In Experiment 3, the vocoded AO stimuli were shown to be less informative than the VO speech. Experiment 4 combined vibrotactile speech stimuli with the visual stimuli during training. Vibrotactile stimuli were shown to promote visual perceptual learning. In Experiment 5, no-training controls were used to show that training with visual speech carried over to consonant identification of untrained CVCVC stimuli but not to lipreading words in sentences. Across this and previous studies, multisensory training effects depended on the functional relationship between pathways engaged during training. Two principles are proposed to account for stimulus effects: (1) Stimuli presented to the trainee's primary perceptual pathway will impede learning by a lower-rank pathway. (2) Stimuli presented to the trainee's lower rank perceptual pathway will promote learning by a higher-rank pathway. The mechanisms supporting these principles are discussed in light of multisensory reverse hierarchy theory (RHT).
在一系列研究中,我们一直在探究多感官训练如何影响语音刺激下的单感官知觉学习。此前,我们报告称,对正常听力的成年人进行语音刺激的视听(AV)训练可以促进纯听觉(AO)知觉学习,但对先天性耳聋且后期植入人工耳蜗的成年人而言,这种训练会阻碍学习。在此,我们在参与唇读训练的正常听力成年人中探寻阻碍和促进作用。在实验1中,针对CVCVC无意义单词视频与无意义图片之间的配对关联进行纯视觉(VO)训练,结果表明,即使是唇读能力较差的人也能将VO单词学到较高的准确率。在实验2中,采用相同范式进行视觉 - 听觉(VA)训练,但增加了同步的声码化语音,这阻碍了配对联想范式中刺激的VO学习。在实验3中,声码化的AO刺激被证明比VO语音的信息量少。实验4在训练过程中将振动触觉语音刺激与视觉刺激相结合。结果表明,振动触觉刺激可促进视觉知觉学习。在实验5中,设置了无训练对照组,以表明视觉语音训练可迁移至未训练的CVCVC刺激的辅音识别,但不能迁移至句子中的唇读单词。综合本次研究及之前的研究,多感官训练效果取决于训练过程中所涉及通路之间的功能关系。我们提出了两条原则来解释刺激效应:(1)呈现给受训者主要知觉通路的刺激会阻碍较低层级通路的学习。(2)呈现给受训者较低层级知觉通路的刺激会促进较高层级通路的学习。我们根据多感官反向层级理论(RHT)对支持这些原则的机制进行了讨论。