Lachance Carly
J Contin Educ Nurs. 2014 Dec;45(12):559-65. doi: 10.3928/00220124-20141120-01.
This literature review on nursing journal clubs evaluates the efficacy of the teaching strategy within the clinical setting.
Peer-reviewed articles were retrieved using an online journal database. Inclusion criteria incorporated information on efficacy of the teaching strategy, evidence-based practices, and continuing education as they related to nursing journal club initiatives.
The literature cited numerous benefits and proved to be in favor of nursing journal clubs. The most common benefits found were nurses remaining abreast of current research, skill development in reading and critically appraising research, and incorporation of evidenice-based practices to patient care. Due to the self-motivated and voluntary nature of this teaching strategy, a limitation commonly identified was lack of participation, and further research on this limitation often was suggested.
Nursing journal clubs proved to be an effective teaching strategy; a finding that remains consistent with the medical pioneers of the movement.
这篇关于护理期刊俱乐部的文献综述评估了该教学策略在临床环境中的效果。
使用在线期刊数据库检索经过同行评审的文章。纳入标准包括与护理期刊俱乐部倡议相关的教学策略效果、循证实践和继续教育方面的信息。
文献列举了诸多益处，并证明支持护理期刊俱乐部。发现的最常见益处是护士跟上当前研究进展、阅读和批判性评估研究的技能发展，以及将循证实践纳入患者护理。由于这种教学策略具有自我激励和自愿的性质，一个常见的局限性是参与度不足，并且经常有人建议对此局限性进行进一步研究。
护理期刊俱乐部被证明是一种有效的教学策略；这一发现与该运动的医学先驱们的观点一致。
