Mwingira Felista, Genton Blaise, Kabanywanyi Abdu-Noor M, Felger Ingrid
Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Socinstrasse 57, 4002 Basel, Switzerland.
Malar J. 2014 Nov 18;13:433. doi: 10.1186/1475-2875-13-433.
The use of molecular techniques to detect malaria parasites has been advocated to improve the accuracy of parasite prevalence estimates, especially in moderate to low endemic settings. Molecular work is time-consuming and costly, thus the effective gains of this technique need to be carefully evaluated. Light microscopy (LM) and rapid diagnostic tests (RDT) are commonly used to detect malaria infection in resource constrained areas, but their limited sensitivity results in underestimation of the proportion of people infected with Plasmodium falciparum. This study aimed to evaluate the extent of missed infections via a community survey in Tanzania, using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) to detect P. falciparum parasites and gametocytes.
Three hundred and thirty individuals of all ages from the Kilombero and Ulanga districts (Tanzania) were enrolled in a cross-sectional survey. Finger prick blood samples were collected for parasite detection by RDT, LM and molecular diagnosis using quantitative 18S rRNA PCR and msp2 nPCR. Gametocytes were detected by LM and by amplifying transcripts of the gametocyte-specific marker pfs25.
Results from all three diagnostic methods were available for a subset of 226 individuals. Prevalence of P. falciparum was 38% (86/226; 95% CI 31.9-44.4%) by qPCR, 15.9% (36/226; 95% CI 11.1-20.7%) by RDT and 5.8% (13/226; 95% CI 2.69- 8.81%) by LM. qPCR was positive for 72% (26/36) of the RDT-positive samples. Gametocyte prevalence was 10.6% (24/226) by pfs25-qRT-PCR and 1.2% by LM.
LM showed the poorest performance, detecting only 15% of P. falciparum parasite carriers identified by PCR. Thus, LM is not a sufficiently accurate technique from which to inform policies and malaria control or elimination efforts. The diagnostic performance of RDT was superior to that of LM. However, it is also insufficient when precise prevalence data are needed for monitoring intervention success or for determining point prevalence rates in countrywide surveillance. Detection of gametocytes by PCR was 10-times more sensitive than by LM. These findings support the need for molecular techniques to accurately estimate the human infectious reservoir and hence the transmission potential in a population.
有人主张使用分子技术检测疟原虫,以提高对疟原虫流行率估计的准确性,尤其是在中度至低度流行地区。分子检测工作既耗时又昂贵,因此需要仔细评估这项技术的实际效益。在资源有限的地区,通常使用光学显微镜(LM)和快速诊断测试(RDT)来检测疟疾感染,但它们的灵敏度有限,导致对感染恶性疟原虫人群比例的估计偏低。本研究旨在通过在坦桑尼亚进行的一项社区调查,评估漏检感染的程度,采用聚合酶链反应(PCR)检测恶性疟原虫和配子体。
来自坦桑尼亚基洛梅罗和乌朗加地区的330名各年龄段个体参与了一项横断面调查。采集手指刺血样本,通过RDT、LM以及使用定量18S rRNA PCR和msp2巢式PCR进行分子诊断来检测寄生虫。通过LM以及扩增配子体特异性标志物pfs25的转录本来检测配子体。
所有三种诊断方法的结果可用于226名个体的一个子集。通过qPCR检测,恶性疟原虫的流行率为38%(86/226;95%置信区间31.9 - 44.4%),通过RDT检测为15.9%(36/226;95%置信区间11.1 - 20.7%),通过LM检测为5.8%(13/226;95%置信区间2.69 - 8.81%)。qPCR对72%(26/36)的RDT阳性样本呈阳性。通过pfs25 - qRT - PCR检测,配子体流行率为10.6%(24/226),通过LM检测为1.2%。
LM表现最差,仅检测到通过PCR鉴定的恶性疟原虫携带者的15%。因此,LM并非一种足够准确的技术,无法为政策制定以及疟疾控制或消除工作提供依据。RDT的诊断性能优于LM。然而,当需要精确的流行率数据来监测干预效果或确定全国监测中的点流行率时,它也不够充分。通过PCR检测配子体的灵敏度比通过LM检测高10倍。这些发现支持了使用分子技术来准确估计人群中的人类感染源以及传播潜力的必要性。