Boyd Clint A
Department of Geology and Geological Engineering Sciences, South Dakota School of Mines and Technology , Rapid City, SD , USA.
PeerJ. 2014 Nov 13;2:e669. doi: 10.7717/peerj.669. eCollection 2014.
Though the dinosaur Thescelosaurus neglectus was first described in 1913 and is known from the relatively fossiliferous Lance and Hell Creek formations in the Western Interior Basin of North America, the cranial anatomy of this species remains poorly understood. The only cranial material confidently referred to this species are three fragmentary bones preserved with the paratype, hindering attempts to understand the systematic relationships of this taxon within Neornithischia. Here the cranial anatomy of T. neglectus is fully described for the first time based on two specimens that include well-preserved cranial material (NCSM 15728 and TLAM.BA.2014.027.0001). Visual inspection of exposed cranial elements of these specimens is supplemented by detailed CT data from NCSM 15728 that enabled the examination of otherwise unexposed surfaces, facilitating a complete description of the cranial anatomy of this species. The skull of T. neglectus displays a unique combination of plesiomorphic and apomorphic traits. The premaxillary and 'cheek' tooth morphologies are relatively derived, though less so than the condition seen in basal iguanodontians, suggesting that the high tooth count present in the premaxillae, maxillae, and dentaries may be related to the extreme elongation of the skull of this species rather than a retention of the plesiomorphic condition. The morphology of the braincase most closely resembles the iguanodontians Dryosaurus and Dysalotosaurus, especially with regard to the morphology of the prootic. One autapomorphic feature is recognized for the first time, along with several additional cranial features that differentiate this species from the closely related and contemporaneous Thescelosaurus assiniboiensis. Published phylogenetic hypotheses of neornithischian dinosaur relationships often differ in the placement of the North American taxon Parksosaurus, with some recovering a close relationship with Thescelosaurus and others with the South American taxon Gasparinisaura, but never both at the same time. The new morphological observations presented herein, combined with re-examination of the holotype of Parksosaurus, suggest that Parksosaurus shares a closer relationship with Thescelosaurus than with Gasparinisaura, and that many of the features previously cited to support a relationship with the latter taxon are either also present in Thescelosaurus, are artifacts of preservation, or are the result of incomplete preparation and inaccurate interpretation of specimens. Additionally, the overall morphology of the skull and lower jaws of both Thescelosaurus and Parksosaurus also closely resemble the Asian taxa Changchunsaurus and Haya, though the interrelationships of these taxa have yet to be tested in a phylogenetic analysis that includes these new morphological data for T. neglectus.
尽管纤弱奇异龙(Thescelosaurus neglectus)于1913年首次被描述,且在北美西部内陆盆地化石相对丰富的兰斯组(Lance Formation)和海尔河组(Hell Creek Formation)中被发现,但该物种的颅骨解剖结构仍鲜为人知。唯一确凿归属于该物种的颅骨材料是与副型标本一起保存的三块破碎骨头,这阻碍了人们了解这个分类单元在新鸟脚亚目(Neornithischia)中的系统关系。在此,基于两个包含保存完好的颅骨材料的标本(NCSM 15728和TLAM.BA.2014.027.0001),首次对纤弱奇异龙的颅骨解剖结构进行了全面描述。对这些标本暴露的颅骨元素进行目视检查,并辅以来自NCSM 15728的详细CT数据,这些数据能够检查原本未暴露的表面,有助于完整描述该物种的颅骨解剖结构。纤弱奇异龙的头骨展现出原始特征和衍生特征的独特组合。前颌骨和“颊部”牙齿形态相对衍生,尽管不如基础禽龙类(iguanodontians)那样明显,这表明前颌骨、上颌骨和齿骨中高数量的牙齿可能与该物种头骨的极度伸长有关,而非保留了原始状态。脑颅的形态与禽龙类的糙齿龙(Dryosaurus)和伤齿龙(Dysalotosaurus)最为相似,尤其是在耳前骨(prootic)的形态方面。首次识别出一个自近裔性状特征,以及其他几个将该物种与亲缘关系密切且同时期的阿西尼博因奇异龙(Thescelosaurus assiniboiensis)区分开来的颅骨特征。已发表的关于新鸟脚亚目恐龙关系的系统发育假说在北美分类单元帕克氏龙(Parksosaurus)的位置上常常存在差异,一些研究认为它与奇异龙关系密切,另一些则认为与南美分类单元加斯帕里尼龙(Gasparinisaura)关系密切,但从未同时出现这两种情况。本文提出的新形态学观察结果,结合对帕克氏龙模式标本的重新检查,表明帕克氏龙与奇异龙的关系比与加斯帕里尼龙更近,并且许多先前被引用来支持与后一个分类单元存在关系的特征,要么在奇异龙中也存在,要么是保存造成的假象,要么是标本准备不完整和解释不准确的结果。此外,奇异龙和帕克氏龙的头骨及下颌的整体形态也与亚洲分类单元长春龙(Changchunsaurus)和哈亚龙(Haya)非常相似,尽管这些分类单元之间的相互关系尚未在包含纤弱奇异龙这些新形态学数据的系统发育分析中进行检验。