García Manuel Ignacio Monge, Romero Manuel Gracia, Cano Anselmo Gil, Aya Hollmann D, Rhodes Andrew, Grounds Robert Michael, Cecconi Maurizio
Servicio de Cuidados Intensivos y Urgencias, Hospital SAS de Jerez, C/Circunvalación s/n, 11407, Jerez de la Frontera, Spain.
Department of Intensive Care Medicine, St George's Healthcare NHS Trust and St George's University of London, Blackshaw Road, Tooting, London, SW17 0QT, UK.
Crit Care. 2014 Nov 19;18(6):626. doi: 10.1186/s13054-014-0626-6.
Functional assessment of arterial load by dynamic arterial elastance (Eadyn), defined as the ratio between pulse pressure variation (PPV) and stroke volume variation (SVV), has recently been shown to predict the arterial pressure response to volume expansion (VE) in hypotensive, preload-dependent patients. However, because both SVV and PPV were obtained from pulse pressure analysis, a mathematical coupling factor could not be excluded. We therefore designed this study to confirm whether Eadyn, obtained from two independent signals, allows the prediction of arterial pressure response to VE in fluid-responsive patients.
We analyzed the response of arterial pressure to an intravenous infusion of 500 ml of normal saline in 53 mechanically ventilated patients with acute circulatory failure and preserved preload dependence. Eadyn was calculated as the simultaneous ratio between PPV (obtained from an arterial line) and SVV (obtained by esophageal Doppler imaging). A total of 80 fluid challenges were performed (median, 1.5 per patient; interquartile range, 1 to 2). Patients were classified according to the increase in mean arterial pressure (MAP) after fluid administration in pressure responders (≥ 10%) and non-responders.
Thirty-three fluid challenges (41.2%) significantly increased MAP. At baseline, Eadyn was higher in pressure responders (1.04 ± 0.28 versus 0.60 ± 0.14; P < 0.0001). Preinfusion Eadyn was related to changes in MAP after fluid administration (R (2) = 0.60; P < 0.0001). At baseline, Eadyn predicted the arterial pressure increase to volume expansion (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.94; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.86 to 0.98; P < 0.0001). A preinfusion Eadyn value ≥ 0.73 (gray zone: 0.72 to 0.88) discriminated pressure responder patients with a sensitivity of 90.9% (95% CI: 75.6 to 98.1%) and a specificity of 91.5% (95% CI: 79.6 to 97.6%).
Functional assessment of arterial load by Eadyn, obtained from two independent signals, enabled the prediction of arterial pressure response to fluid administration in mechanically ventilated, preload-dependent patients with acute circulatory failure.
通过动态动脉弹性(Eadyn)对动脉负荷进行功能评估,其定义为脉压变异(PPV)与每搏量变异(SVV)之比,最近已被证明可预测低血压、前负荷依赖患者对容量扩张(VE)的动脉压反应。然而,由于SVV和PPV均从脉压分析中获得,无法排除数学耦合因素。因此,我们设计了本研究,以确认从两个独立信号获得的Eadyn是否能够预测液体反应性患者对VE的动脉压反应。
我们分析了53例机械通气的急性循环衰竭且保留前负荷依赖性患者静脉输注500 ml生理盐水后动脉压的反应。Eadyn计算为PPV(从动脉导管获得)与SVV(通过食管多普勒成像获得)的同步比值。共进行了80次液体负荷试验(中位数,每位患者1.5次;四分位间距,1至2次)。根据液体输注后平均动脉压(MAP)的升高情况,将患者分为压力反应者(≥10%)和无反应者。
33次液体负荷试验(41.2%)显著升高了MAP。基线时,压力反应者的Eadyn较高(1.04±0.28对0.60±0.14;P<0.0001)。输注前Eadyn与液体输注后MAP的变化相关(R(2)=0.60;P<0.0001)。基线时,Eadyn可预测容量扩张时动脉压的升高(受试者工作特征曲线下面积,0.94;95%置信区间(CI):0.86至0.98;P<0.0001)。输注前Eadyn值≥0.73(灰色区域:0.72至0.88)可区分压力反应者,敏感性为90.9%(95%CI:75.6至98.1%),特异性为91.5%(95%CI:79.6至97.6%)。
通过从两个独立信号获得的Eadyn对动脉负荷进行功能评估,能够预测机械通气的急性循环衰竭且前负荷依赖患者对液体输注的动脉压反应。