A postscript to Gross v Switzerland.
出版信息
Med Law Rev. 2014 Fall;22(4):656. doi: 10.1093/medlaw/fwu035.
PMID:25411256
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
A postscript to Gross v Switzerland.
Med Law Rev. 2014 Fall;22(4):656. doi: 10.1093/medlaw/fwu035.
2
Existential suffering and the extent of the right to physician-assisted suicide in Switzerland: Gross v Switzerland [2013] ECHR 67810/10.瑞士存在主义痛苦与医生协助自杀权的范围：格罗斯诉瑞士案[2013]欧洲人权法院第67810/10号
Med Law Rev. 2014 Winter;22(1):109-18. doi: 10.1093/medlaw/fwt038. Epub 2014 Jan 28.
3
4
Suicide assistance for mentally disordered individuals in Switzerland and the state's positive obligation to facilitate dignified suicide: Haas C. Suisse, Cour europeenne des droits de l'homme, 1re section (20 janvier 2011) (Unreported).瑞士为精神障碍患者提供自杀协助以及国家促进有尊严自杀的积极义务：哈斯 C. 瑞士，欧洲人权法院，第一庭（2011 年 1 月 20 日）（未报告）。
Med Law Rev. 2012 Winter;20(1):157-66. doi: 10.1093/medlaw/fwr033. Epub 2012 Jan 13.
5
Nonphysician-assisted suicide in Switzerland.瑞士的非医生协助自杀。
Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2013 Jul;22(3):246-53. doi: 10.1017/S0963180113000054. Epub 2013 Apr 30.
6
[Not Available].
Praxis (Bern 1994). 2017 Jun;106(13):711-713. doi: 10.1024/1661-8157/a002706.
7
Assisted dying: legal ambiguity lets down families as well as patients.协助死亡：法律上的模糊不清让患者及其家属都失望。
BMJ. 2015 Aug 19;351:h4453. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h4453.
8
[To learn how to die, France will have to stop looking towards Switzerland].
Rev Med Suisse. 2015 Mar 25;11(467):742-3.
9
[Assisted dying, patient autonomy and palliative care: commercial enterprise at the end of life?].[协助死亡、患者自主权与姑息治疗：临终时的商业行为？]
Pflege Z. 2008 Oct;61(10):567-9.
10
[Open dialogue is necessary].
Krankenpfl Soins Infirm. 2009;102(7):41-3.
Zotero 插件