Cheng Mu-Hua, Zeng Feng-Wei, Xie Liang-Jun, Li Jian-Fang, Zhang Feng, Jiang Hang
Department of Nuclear Medicine, Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, GuangZhou, Guangdong, China.
Clin Physiol Funct Imaging. 2016 Mar;36(2):118-25. doi: 10.1111/cpf.12204. Epub 2014 Nov 21.
The estimation of the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is essential for the renal function. However, all estimation methods for GFR have advantages and disadvantages. The aim of this study was to develop a new quantitative method for estimating GFR and evaluate its clinical value.
The new GFR was estimated by quantifying the accumulation of Tc-99m DTPA in the dual kidneys and bladder during a gamma camera renogram study in 116 patients with chronic kidney disease. GFR was determined by this new method (nGFR), Gates' gamma camera technique (gGFR), a two-plasma sampling method (tGFR) and creatinine-based clearance as estimated by Cockcroft-Gault (cGFR) and abbreviated MDRD (aGFR) formulae. The correlation analysis, Bland-Altman analysis and receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) plots were carried out among above methods.
The nGFR value has significant correlation with tGRF (r = 0·827, P<0·01). The nGFR had the best overall performances with a lowest bias deviation (3·1 ml min(-1) /1·73 m(2) ), better precision (53·0 ml min(-1) /1·73 m(2) ), narrowest interquartile range (13·5 ml min(-1) /1·73 m(2) ) and best accuracy (68·1%) within 30% of the tGFR, compared with those of gGFR, cGFR and aGFR. The new method had the similar maximum accuracy with the Gates' method and creatinine clearance as estimated by Cockcroft-Gault and abbreviated modification of diet in renal disease (MDRD) method. The new method had better repeatability characteristic compared with the Gates' method.
The new method for estimating GFR had the better performances compared with the Gates' method and creatinine clearance as estimated by Cockcroft-Gault and MDRD method.
肾小球滤过率(GFR)的评估对肾功能至关重要。然而,所有GFR的评估方法都有其优缺点。本研究的目的是开发一种新的定量方法来估算GFR并评估其临床价值。
在116例慢性肾病患者的γ相机肾图研究中,通过定量Tc-99m DTPA在双肾和膀胱中的蓄积来估算新的GFR。GFR通过这种新方法(nGFR)、Gatesγ相机技术(gGFR)、双血浆采样法(tGFR)以及Cockcroft-Gault公式(cGFR)和简化MDRD公式(aGFR)估算的基于肌酐的清除率来确定。对上述方法进行相关性分析、Bland-Altman分析和受试者操作特征(ROC)曲线分析。
nGFR值与tGRF显著相关(r = 0·827,P<0·01)。与gGFR、cGFR和aGFR相比,nGFR具有最佳的总体性能,偏差最低(3·1 ml min(-1)/1·73 m(2)),精密度更高(53·0 ml min(-1)/1·73 m(2)),四分位间距最窄(13·5 ml min(-1)/1·73 m(2)),在tGFR的30%范围内准确性最佳(68·1%)。新方法与Gates方法以及Cockcroft-Gault和简化肾病饮食改良(MDRD)方法估算的肌酐清除率具有相似的最大准确性。与Gates方法相比,新方法具有更好的重复性特征。
与Gates方法以及Cockcroft-Gault和MDRD方法估算的肌酐清除率相比,估算GFR的新方法具有更好的性能。