Berns Jeffrey S
Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2015 Nov 6;10(11):2065-72. doi: 10.2215/CJN.00340115. Epub 2015 Apr 16.
The development and widespread use of serum creatinine concentration-based prediction equations to calculate eGFR have been major advances for detection of patients with CKD and the epidemiologic study of CKD and its outcomes. However, these equations as well as those that also incorporate serum cystatin C concentration provide GFR estimates that, although reasonably precise on average, can differ markedly and in clinically important ways from actual GFR. Thus, it is important that clinicians who use these equations for clinical decision-making be familiar with their strengths and weaknesses and have an appreciation of their potential for error. More precise knowledge of actual GFR is important in certain clinical circumstances, including, as presented in this Attending Rounds, patients with stage 5 CKD, in whom decisions regarding dialysis initiation are necessary. Nephrologists should have the ability to accurately determine GFR when needed if clinical circumstances suggest inaccuracy of the calculated eGFR reported by the clinical laboratory.
基于血清肌酐浓度的预测方程来计算估算肾小球滤过率(eGFR),其发展与广泛应用是慢性肾脏病(CKD)患者检测以及CKD及其转归的流行病学研究方面的重大进展。然而,这些方程以及那些还纳入血清胱抑素C浓度的方程所提供的肾小球滤过率(GFR)估算值,尽管平均而言较为精确,但可能与实际GFR存在显著差异且在临床上具有重要意义。因此,使用这些方程进行临床决策的临床医生熟悉其优缺点并了解其潜在误差很重要。在某些临床情况下,包括在本次主治医师查房中所呈现的5期CKD患者中,对于启动透析的决策而言,更精确地了解实际GFR很重要。如果临床情况提示临床实验室报告的计算eGFR不准确,肾脏病医生应具备在需要时准确测定GFR的能力。