Leung Joseph Y C, Critchley Lester A H, Yung Alex L K, Kumta Shekhar M
Teaching and Learning Resources Centre, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong.
Office of Educational Services, Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, New Territories, Hong Kong.
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2015 Oct;20(4):885-901. doi: 10.1007/s10459-014-9570-0. Epub 2014 Nov 21.
Virtual patients are computerised representations of realistic clinical cases. They were developed to teach clinical reasoning skills through delivery of multiple standardized patient cases. The anesthesia course at The Chinese University of Hong Kong developed two novel types of virtual patients, formative assessment cases studies and storyline, to teach its final year medical students on a 2 week rotational course. Acute pain management cases were used to test if these two types of virtual patient could enhance student learning. A 2 × 2 cross over study was performed in academic year 2010-2011 on 130 students divided into four groups of 32-34. Performance was evaluated by acute pain management items set within three examinations; an end of module 60-item multiple choice paper, a short answer modified essay paper and the end of year final surgery modified essay paper. The pain management case studies were found to enhanced student performance in all three examinations, whilst the storyline virtual patient had no demonstrable effect. Student-teaching evaluation questionnaires showed that the case studies were favored more than the storyline virtual patient. Login times showed that students on average logged onto the case studies for 6 h, whereas only half the students logged on and used the storyline virtual patient. Formative assessment case studies were well liked by the students and reinforced learning of clinical algorithms through repetition and feedback, whereas the educational role of the more narrative and less interactive storyline virtual patient was less clear .
虚拟患者是现实临床病例的计算机化呈现。它们旨在通过提供多个标准化患者病例来教授临床推理技能。香港中文大学的麻醉课程开发了两种新型虚拟患者,即形成性评估案例研究和故事情节,用于在为期两周的轮转课程中教授其最后一年的医学生。使用急性疼痛管理病例来测试这两种类型的虚拟患者是否能提高学生的学习效果。在2010 - 2011学年对130名学生进行了一项2×2交叉研究,这些学生被分成四组,每组32 - 34人。通过在三次考试中设置的急性疼痛管理项目来评估表现;模块结束时的60道多项选择题试卷、简答题修改作文试卷以及年终最终外科修改作文试卷。结果发现,疼痛管理案例研究在所有三次考试中都提高了学生的表现,而故事情节虚拟患者没有明显效果。学生教学评价问卷显示,案例研究比故事情节虚拟患者更受青睐。登录时间显示,学生平均登录案例研究6小时,而只有一半的学生登录并使用故事情节虚拟患者。形成性评估案例研究受到学生的喜爱,并通过重复和反馈加强了对临床算法的学习,而叙事性更强、互动性更弱的故事情节虚拟患者的教育作用则不太明确。