Seynnes O R, Bojsen-Møller J, Albracht K, Arndt A, Cronin N J, Finni T, Magnusson S P
Norwegian School of Sport Sciences, Oslo, Norway;
Institute of Biomechanics and Orthopaedics, German Sport University, Cologne, Germany;
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2015 Jan 15;118(2):133-41. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00849.2014. Epub 2014 Nov 20.
In the past 20 years, the use of ultrasound-based methods has become a standard approach to measure tendon mechanical properties in vivo. Yet the multitude of methodological approaches adopted by various research groups probably contribute to the large variability of reported values. The technique of obtaining and relating tendon deformation to tensile force in vivo has been applied differently, depending on practical constraints or scientific points of view. Divergence can be seen in 1) methodological considerations, such as the choice of anatomical features to scan and to track, force measurements, or signal synchronization; and 2) in physiological considerations related to the viscoelastic behavior or length measurements of tendons. Hence, the purpose of the present review is to assess and discuss the physiological and technical aspects connected to in vivo testing of tendon mechanical properties. In doing so, our aim is to provide the reader with a qualitative analysis of ultrasound-based techniques. Finally, a list of recommendations is proposed for a number of selected issues.
在过去20年里,基于超声的方法已成为体内测量肌腱力学性能的标准方法。然而,各个研究小组采用的多种方法可能导致了报告值的巨大差异。在体内获取肌腱变形并将其与拉力相关联的技术应用方式各不相同,这取决于实际限制或科学观点。在以下方面可以看到差异:1)方法学考量,如扫描和跟踪的解剖特征选择、力测量或信号同步;2)与肌腱粘弹性行为或长度测量相关的生理学考量。因此,本综述的目的是评估和讨论与肌腱力学性能体内测试相关的生理和技术方面。在此过程中,我们的目的是为读者提供对基于超声技术的定性分析。最后,针对一些选定问题提出了一系列建议。