1 Department of Radiology, Foundation IRCCS Cà Granda Maggiore Policlinico Hospital. Via Francesco Sforza, 35-Milan, Italy.
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2014 Dec;203(6):1171-80. doi: 10.2214/AJR.13.11915.
The purposes of this study were to retrospectively assess the frequency of acute aortic intramural hematoma and evaluate whether the elimination of the unenhanced imaging acquisition series from the dual-phase MDCT angiography (CTA) protocol for chest pain might affect diagnostic accuracy in detecting intramural hematoma and justify the reduced radiation dose.
From October 2006 to November 2012, 306 patients (mean age, 65.0 years) with acute chest pain underwent emergency CTA with a 64-MDCT scanner. Two experienced cardiovascular radiologists, blinded to the diagnosis, assessed the images in two different sessions in which enhanced (single-phase CTA) and combined unenhanced and contrast-enhanced (dual-phase CTA) findings were evaluated. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy along with 95% CIs were calculated. Surgical and pathologic diagnoses, including findings at clinical follow-up and any subsequent imaging modality, were used as reference standards.
Thirty-six patients were suspected of having intramural hematoma; 16 patients underwent both surgery and transesophageal echocardiography (TEE), and the remaining 20 underwent TEE. Single-phase CTA showed a higher number of false-negative and false-positive results than dual-phase CTA. With intramural hematoma frequency of 12% (95% CI, 8.38-15.91%), sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 94.4% (81.3-99.3%), 99.3% (97.4-99.9%), and 98.7% (96.7-99.6%) for combined dual-phase CTA and 68.4% (51.4-82.5%), 96.3% (93.2-98.2%), and 92.8% (89.3-95.4%) for single-phase CTA. Dual-phase was significantly better than single-phase CTA with respect to sensitivity (p=0.002), specificity (p=0.008), overall accuracy (p<0.001), and interrater agreement (p=0.001).
The frequency of acute aortic intramural hematoma is similar to that previously reported. The acquisition of unenhanced images during the chest pain dual-phase CTA protocol significantly improves diagnostic accuracy over single-phase CTA.
本研究旨在回顾性评估急性主动脉壁内血肿的发生率,并评价胸痛双相 MDCT 血管造影(CTA)方案中是否消除非增强成像采集序列是否会影响检测壁内血肿的诊断准确性,并证明降低辐射剂量的合理性。
2006 年 10 月至 2012 年 11 月,306 例(平均年龄 65.0 岁)急性胸痛患者接受了 64 层 MDCT 扫描仪的紧急 CTA。两位有经验的心血管放射科医生在两次不同的会议中对图像进行评估,评估了增强(单相 CTA)和联合非增强和对比增强(双相 CTA)的结果。计算了敏感性、特异性和准确性及其 95%置信区间。手术和病理诊断,包括临床随访和任何后续影像学检查的结果,被用作参考标准。
36 例患者被怀疑患有壁内血肿;16 例患者同时接受了手术和经食管超声心动图(TEE)检查,其余 20 例患者仅接受了 TEE 检查。单相 CTA 显示出比双相 CTA 更高的假阴性和假阳性结果数量。壁内血肿发生率为 12%(95%可信区间,8.38%-15.91%),单相 CTA 的敏感性、特异性和准确性分别为 94.4%(81.3%-99.3%)、99.3%(97.4%-99.9%)和 98.7%(96.7%-99.6%),双相 CTA 为 68.4%(51.4%-82.5%)、96.3%(93.2%-98.2%)和 92.8%(89.3%-95.4%)。双相 CTA 在敏感性(p=0.002)、特异性(p=0.008)、总体准确性(p<0.001)和观察者间一致性(p=0.001)方面明显优于单相 CTA。
急性主动脉壁内血肿的发生率与先前报道的相似。在胸痛双相 CTA 方案中采集非增强图像可显著提高单相 CTA 的诊断准确性。