Digestive Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven and KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Department of Oncology, Arcispedale S. Maria Nuova-IRCCS, Reggio Emilia, Italy.
Ann Oncol. 2015 Jan;26(1):149-156. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdu496.
Docetaxel/cisplatin/infusional 5-fluorouracil (5-FU; DCF) is a standard chemotherapy regimen for patients with advanced gastric cancer (GC). This phase II study evaluated docetaxel/oxaliplatin (TE), docetaxel/oxaliplatin/5-FU (TEF), and docetaxel/oxaliplatin/capecitabine (TEX) in patients with advanced GC.
Patients with metastatic or locally recurrent gastric adenocarcinoma (including carcinoma of the gastro-oesophageal junction) were randomly assigned (1 : 1 : 1) to TE, TEF, or TEX. Each regimen was tested at two doses before full evaluation at optimized dose levels. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). Overall survival (OS), tumour response, and safety were also assessed. A therapeutic index (median PFS relative to the incidence of febrile neutropenia) was calculated for each regimen and compared with DCF (historical data).
Overall, 248 patients were randomly assigned to receive optimized dose treatment. Median PFS was longer with TEF (7.66 [95% confidence interval (CI): 6.97-9.40] months) versus TE (4.50 [3.68-5.32] months) and TEX (5.55 [4.30-6.37] months). Median OS was 14.59 (95% CI: 11.70-21.78) months for TEF versus 8.97 (7.79-10.87) months for TE and 11.30 (8.08-14.03) months for TEX. The rate of tumour response (complete or partial) was 46.6% (95% CI 35.9-57.5) for TEF versus 23.1% (14.3-34.0) for TE and 25.6% (16.6-36.4) for TEX. The frequency and type of adverse events (AEs) were similar across the three arms. Common grade 3/4 AEs were fatigue (21%), sensory neuropathy (14%), and diarrhoea (13%). Febrile neutropenia was reported in 2% (TEF), 14% (TE), and 9% (TEX) of patients. The therapeutic index was improved with TEF versus TEX, TE, or DCF.
These results suggest that TEF is worthy of evaluation as an arm in a phase III trial or as a backbone regimen for new targeted agents in advanced GC. CLINICALTRIALS.GOV: Identifier Trial registration number: NCT00382720.
多西他赛/顺铂/持续输注氟尿嘧啶(5-FU;DCF)是晚期胃癌(GC)患者的标准化疗方案。这项 II 期研究评估了多西他赛/奥沙利铂(TE)、多西他赛/奥沙利铂/5-FU(TEF)和多西他赛/奥沙利铂/卡培他滨(TEX)在晚期 GC 患者中的应用。
转移性或局部复发性胃腺癌(包括胃食管交界处癌)患者被随机分配(1:1:1)至 TE、TEF 或 TEX 组。在优化剂量水平进行全面评估之前,每个方案均在两个剂量水平进行了测试。主要终点是无进展生存期(PFS)。还评估了总生存期(OS)、肿瘤反应和安全性。为每个方案计算了治疗指数(相对于发热性中性粒细胞减少症发生率的中位 PFS),并与 DCF(历史数据)进行了比较。
共有 248 名患者被随机分配接受优化剂量治疗。TEF(7.66 [95%置信区间(CI):6.97-9.40] 个月)的中位 PFS 长于 TE(4.50 [3.68-5.32] 个月)和 TEX(5.55 [4.30-6.37] 个月)。TEF 的中位 OS 为 14.59(95%CI:11.70-21.78)个月,TE 为 8.97(7.79-10.87)个月,TEX 为 11.30(8.08-14.03)个月。TEF 的肿瘤反应(完全或部分)率为 46.6%(95%CI 35.9-57.5),TE 为 23.1%(14.3-34.0),TEX 为 25.6%(16.6-36.4)。三组患者的不良事件(AE)的频率和类型相似。常见的 3/4 级 AE 为疲劳(21%)、感觉神经病变(14%)和腹泻(13%)。发热性中性粒细胞减少症分别在 2%(TEF)、14%(TE)和 9%(TEX)的患者中报告。与 TEX、TE 或 DCF 相比,TEF 的治疗指数有所改善。
这些结果表明,TEF 值得作为 III 期试验的一个治疗臂或作为晚期 GC 新靶向药物的骨干方案进行评估。CLINICALTRIALS.GOV:标识符试验注册号:NCT00382720。