Glick Shimon
Harefuah. 2014 Sep;153(9):554-6.
In contrast to the position of the World Medical Association and the Ethics Council of the Israel Medical Association, the author argues for forced-feeding of hunger-striking prisoners when their condition reaches a stage of danger of death or permanent injury. This position is based on the priority of human life over autonomy, and of a communitarian ethic. This position is supported by a District Court decision ordering the feeding of a hunger-striking prisoner, by a Supreme Court decision imposing surgery on a non-consenting prisoner, and in line with Israel's Patient's Right Law.
与世界医学协会和以色列医学协会伦理委员会的立场相反,作者主张,当绝食囚犯的状况达到死亡或永久性伤害的危险阶段时,应对其进行强制喂食。这一立场基于生命优先于自主权以及社群主义伦理。这一立场得到了地方法院关于命令对一名绝食囚犯进行喂食的裁决、最高法院关于对一名不同意的囚犯实施手术的裁决的支持,并且符合以色列的《患者权利法》。