Theoretical Biology, Institute of Integrative Biology, ETH Zürich, 8092, Zürich, Switzerland.
Ecol Lett. 2015 Jan;18(1):74-84. doi: 10.1111/ele.12392. Epub 2014 Nov 23.
Social insect colonies can be seen as a distinct form of biological organisation because they function as superorganisms. Understanding how natural selection acts on the emergence and maintenance of these colonies remains a major question in evolutionary biology and ecology. Here, we explore this by using multi-type branching processes to calculate the basic reproductive ratios and the extinction probabilities for solitary vs. eusocial reproductive strategies. We find that eusociality, albeit being hugely successful once established, is generally less stable than solitary reproduction unless large demographic advantages of eusociality arise for small colony sizes. We also demonstrate how such demographic constraints can be overcome by the presence of ecological niches that strongly favour eusociality. Our results characterise the risk-return trade-offs between solitary and eusocial reproduction, and help to explain why eusociality is taxonomically rare: eusociality is a high-risk, high-reward strategy, whereas solitary reproduction is more conservative.
昆虫社会群体可以被视为一种独特的生物组织形式,因为它们作为超个体发挥作用。了解自然选择如何作用于这些群体的出现和维持仍然是进化生物学和生态学的一个主要问题。在这里,我们通过使用多类型分支过程来计算孤独与共生生殖策略的基本繁殖率和灭绝概率,从而探讨了这个问题。我们发现,共生虽然一旦建立就非常成功,但通常不如孤独繁殖稳定,除非共生在小群体规模下产生巨大的人口优势。我们还展示了生态位如何通过强烈有利于共生的方式克服这种人口限制。我们的结果描述了孤独和共生生殖之间的风险回报权衡,并有助于解释为什么共生在分类上很少见:共生是一种高风险、高回报的策略,而孤独生殖则更为保守。