Suppr超能文献

仅基于家庭血压监测或联合诊室及动态血压测量的高血压管理成本估算。

Cost estimation of hypertension management based on home blood pressure monitoring alone or combined office and ambulatory blood pressure measurements.

作者信息

Boubouchairopoulou Nadia, Karpettas Nikos, Athanasakis Kostas, Kollias Anastasios, Protogerou Athanase D, Achimastos Apostolos, Stergiou George S

机构信息

Department of Health Economics, National School of Public Health, Athens, Greece.

Hypertension Center, STRIDE Hellas-7, Third University Department of Medicine, Sotiria Hospital, Athens, Greece.

出版信息

J Am Soc Hypertens. 2014 Oct;8(10):732-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jash.2014.07.027. Epub 2014 Jul 16.

Abstract

This study aims at estimating the resources consumed and subsequent costs for hypertension management, using home blood pressure (BP) monitoring (HBPM) alone versus combined clinic measurements and ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (C/ABPM). One hundred sixteen untreated hypertensive subjects were randomized to use HBPM or C/ABPM for antihypertensive treatment initiation and titration. Health resources utilized within 12-months follow-up, their respective costs, and hypertension control were assessed. The total cost of the first year of hypertension management was lower in HBPM than C/ABPM arm (€1336.0 vs. €1473.5 per subject, respectively; P < .001). Laboratory tests' cost was identical in both arms. There was no difference in achieved BP control and drug expenditure (HBPM: €233.1 per subject; C/ABPM: €247.6 per subject; P = not significant), whereas the cost of BP measurements and/or visits was higher in C/ABPM arm (€393.9 vs. €516.9, per patient, respectively P < .001). The cost for subsequent years (>1) was €348.9 and €440.2 per subject, respectively for HBPM and C/ABPM arm and €2731.4 versus €3234.3 per subject, respectively (P < .001) for a 5-year projection. HBPM used alone for the first year of hypertension management presents lower cost than C/ABPM, and the same trend is observed in 5-year projection. The results on the resources consumption can be used to make cost estimates for other health-care systems.

摘要

本研究旨在评估单纯使用家庭血压(BP)监测(HBPM)与联合诊所测量和动态血压监测(C/ABPM)进行高血压管理所消耗的资源及后续成本。116名未经治疗的高血压患者被随机分为使用HBPM或C/ABPM进行降压治疗起始和滴定。评估了12个月随访期间使用的卫生资源、各自成本以及高血压控制情况。高血压管理第一年的总成本在HBPM组低于C/ABPM组(分别为每位受试者1336.0欧元和1473.5欧元;P <.001)。两组实验室检查成本相同。血压控制和药物支出无差异(HBPM:每位受试者233.1欧元;C/ABPM:每位受试者247.6欧元;P =无显著性差异),而C/ABPM组血压测量和/或就诊成本更高(分别为每位患者393.9欧元和516.9欧元,P <.001)。后续年份(>1)的成本,HBPM组和C/ABPM组分别为每位受试者348.9欧元和440.2欧元,5年预测分别为每位受试者2731.4欧元和3234.3欧元(P <.001)。高血压管理第一年单纯使用HBPM的成本低于C/ABPM,5年预测中也观察到相同趋势。资源消耗结果可用于其他医疗保健系统的成本估算。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验