Tews W, Weise S, Syrbe S, Hirsch W, Viehweger A, Merkenschlager A, Bertsche A, Kiess W, Bernhard M K
Zentrum für Frauen- und Kindermedizin, Universität Leipzig, Leipzig.
Neuropädiatrie, Universitätsklinik und Poliklinik für Kinder und Jugendliche Leipzig, Leipzig.
Klin Padiatr. 2015 Mar;227(2):84-8. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1394421. Epub 2014 Nov 24.
After a first afebrile seizure, EEG in addition to cMRI is recommended for pediatric patients. Once indications requiring immediate treatment are excluded, it is of interest to determine if the results provide a prognostic tool for seizure relapses.
Patients aged between 1 month and 18 years who had a first afebrile seizure between 2006 and 2008 were retrospectively studied and monitored for another 48 months.
Out of 248 patients, 62.5% had generalized and 36.3% focal seizures. 34.7% of the EEG results were pathological. 176 patients had a cMRI that showed in 23.3% probable epileptogenic lesions. 3 patients with benign cerebral tumours needed surgical therapy. In the following 48 months 29.4% of the children showed seizure relapses. There was a correlation between epileptic patterns in the EEG and further seizures (p=0.0001). However, the sensitivity of the EEG based diagnoses was 0.6, the specificity 0.78 and the positive predictive value 0.52. There was no correlation between epileptogenic lesions and the probability of seizure relapses. The sensitivity of the cMRI to this effect was 0.36, the specificity 0.74 and the positive predictive value 0.34.
The EEG is superior to cMRI for predicting seizure relapses. The percentage of noticeable cMRI findings is high but this has low therapeutic relevance and is assumed to largely represent "incidental findings". It is important to question the value of MRI investigations for sedated small children except in the case of emergencies. The key question is whether the cMRI should be deployed to diagnose epilepsy, the probability of seizure recurrences or to classify the entity of a most likely epilepsy.
对于儿科患者,首次无热惊厥后建议进行脑电图(EEG)检查及头颅磁共振成像(cMRI)检查。一旦排除需要立即治疗的指征,确定这些检查结果是否能为惊厥复发提供预后工具就很有意义。
对2006年至2008年间首次发生无热惊厥的1个月至18岁患者进行回顾性研究,并对其进行48个月的监测。
248例患者中,62.5%为全身性惊厥,36.3%为局灶性惊厥。34.7%的EEG结果为病理性。176例患者进行了cMRI检查,其中23.3%显示可能存在致痫性病变。3例患有良性脑肿瘤的患者需要手术治疗。在随后的48个月里,29.4%的儿童出现惊厥复发。EEG中的癫痫样放电模式与再次惊厥之间存在相关性(p = 0.0001)。然而,基于EEG诊断的敏感性为0.6,特异性为0.78,阳性预测值为0.52。致痫性病变与惊厥复发的可能性之间无相关性。cMRI对此效应的敏感性为0.36,特异性为0.74,阳性预测值为0.34。
在预测惊厥复发方面,EEG优于cMRI。cMRI明显异常发现的比例较高,但治疗相关性较低,大多被认为是“偶然发现”。除紧急情况外,质疑对镇静状态下幼儿进行MRI检查的价值很重要。关键问题在于cMRI是应用于诊断癫痫、惊厥复发的可能性,还是用于对最可能的癫痫类型进行分类。